Expanding Evidence Approaches for Learning in a Digital World / Barbara Means and Kea Anderson.

This report describes how big data and an evidence framework can align across five contexts of educational improvement. It explains that before working with big data, there is an important prerequisite: the proposed innovation should align with deeper learning objectives and should incorporate sound...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Authors: Means, Barbara, Anderson, Kea (Author)
Corporate Authors: SRI International, United States. Office of Educational Technology
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 2013.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b8905848
003 CoU
005 20170209091055.2
006 m o d f
007 cr |||||||||||
008 130201s2013 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed566873 
035 |a (MvI) 3T000000547622 
040 |a ericd  |b eng  |c MvI  |d MvI 
099 |a ED566873 
100 1 |a Means, Barbara. 
245 1 0 |a Expanding Evidence Approaches for Learning in a Digital World /  |c Barbara Means and Kea Anderson. 
264 1 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 2013. 
300 |a 1 online resource (112 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a Availability: Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education. Available from: ED Pubs. P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794-1398. Tel: 202-401-1444; Fax: 202-401-3941; Web site: http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/index.html.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Contract Number: ED04CO0040.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Abstractor: ERIC.  |5 ericd. 
516 |a Text (Reports, Descriptive) 
520 |a This report describes how big data and an evidence framework can align across five contexts of educational improvement. It explains that before working with big data, there is an important prerequisite: the proposed innovation should align with deeper learning objectives and should incorporate sound learning sciences principles. New curriculum standards, such as the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards, emphasize deeper learning objectives. Unless these are substantively addressed at the core of a learning resource, it is unlikely the resource will meet these important objectives. Likewise, a proposed innovation is more likely to succeed if it is grounded in fundamental principles of how people learn. Once these prerequisites are met, the evidence framework describes five opportunities for utilizing big data, each in a different educational context: (1) During development of an innovative learning resource, educational data mining and learning analytics can uncover patterns of learner behavior that can be used to guide improvement. (2) As learners use a digital resource, adaptive learning systems can personalize learning by using big data with new evidence models. (3) As institutions try to support struggling students, big data and new data analysis techniques can help guide intervention. (4) As educational systems assess student achievement, big data and new evidence models can shift measurements to focus more on what is really important and to provide more timely information to educators and students. (5) As educators choose and adapt learning resources from the vast array now offered on the Internet, big data and new evidence models can inform their choices. The ideas presented in this report have implications for learning technology developers, consumers, education researchers, policymakers, and research funders. The Technical Working Group of researchers and policymakers who provided input and guidance for this evidence framework also developed a set of recommendations for putting the framework into action. The resulting 14 recommendations for capitalizing on new approaches to evidence as digital resources are provided. The report also includes cautionary notes about the ethical issues that must be tackled in handling student data. 
521 8 |a Policymakers.  |b ericd. 
521 8 |a Researchers.  |b ericd. 
524 |a Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Educational Technology.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Technology Uses in Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Educational Resources.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Individualized Instruction.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Student Needs.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Computer Assisted Testing.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Evaluation Methods.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Decision Making.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Data Collection.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Data Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Research Utilization.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Research and Development.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Anderson, Kea,  |e author. 
710 2 |a SRI International. 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Office of Educational Technology. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED566873.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b89058483  |b 07-06-22  |c 11-01-16 
998 |a web  |b 11-01-16  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 65bb8474-9e4c-5199-8671-fcc1dc2ae930  |s 6253602a-a87b-5409-ab0d-31af1344df94 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED566873  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1