Testing in the Nation's Schools and Districts: How Much? [electronic resource] : What Kinds? To What Ends? At What Costs? / James Burry and Others.

The Center for the Study of Evaluation's (CSE) Test Use Project (1979) has gathered information that is nationally representative and illustrative of the entire range of tests being administered. The primary intention of this phase of the ongoing study is to identify the direct and indirect cos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Burry, James
Corporate Author: University of California, Los Angeles. Center for the Study of Evaluation
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1982.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6446288
003 CoU
005 20080221101658.1
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 820301s1982 xx |||| o ||| s eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed220539 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
088 |a CSE-R-194 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED220539 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED220539 
100 1 |a Burry, James. 
245 1 0 |a Testing in the Nation's Schools and Districts: How Much?  |h [electronic resource] :  |b What Kinds? To What Ends? At What Costs? /  |c James Burry and Others. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1982. 
300 |a 142 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED220539. 
500 |a Sponsoring Agency: National Inst. of Education (ED), Washington, DC.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (66th, New York, NY, March 19-23, 1982).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a The Center for the Study of Evaluation's (CSE) Test Use Project (1979) has gathered information that is nationally representative and illustrative of the entire range of tests being administered. The primary intention of this phase of the ongoing study is to identify the direct and indirect costs of testing. The four papers included here offer school districts a fresh vantage point from which to consider how their assessment programs can be improved to meet a variety of decision audiences. Bruce Choppin discusses the survey's sampling procedures and offers an overview of the main findings, concluding with ideas to reduce the amount of testing time while maintaining its relevance for various audiences. Donald Dorr-Bremme amplifies the initial findings in a teacher-as-practical-decision-maker context, with implications for the design and implementation of future assessment programs. James Burry discusses CSE's test use findings indicating teachers' stated uses of assessment information for classroom decisions and recommending methodological, technical, and organizational considerations to be addressed to produce more efficient assessment programs. James Catterall discusses cost-accounting, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit paradigms, and offers a theoretical model for thinking about costs and testing. (PN) 
650 1 7 |a Cost Effectiveness.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Educational Assessment.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Educational Economics.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Educational Policy.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Minimum Competency Testing.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a National Surveys.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Program Costs.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a School Districts.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Test Results.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Test Use.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Testing.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Testing Programs.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a University of California, Los Angeles.  |b Center for the Study of Evaluation. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED220539.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64462882  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-18-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 8f8de061-3898-5c1a-9f8b-1297d881ec40  |s 457d18bd-02d7-5315-8c8e-c3fd546b2614 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED220539  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1