The Effect of Preferred or Nonpreferred Method of Study, Various Study Techniques, and Cognitive Style on Recall and Recognition [electronic resource] / Linda Annis and J. Kent Davis.
Field-independent and field-dependent college students studied a 1525-word article under a preferred or nonpreferred study condition (read only, underline, or note taking). Half of the subjects reviewed the material prior to an examination and half did not. Results indicated that field-independent s...
Saved in:
| Online Access: |
Full Text (via ERIC) |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[S.l.] :
Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
1977.
|
| Subjects: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002u 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | b6370220 | ||
| 003 | CoU | ||
| 005 | 20090216151924.0 | ||
| 006 | m d f | ||
| 007 | cr un | ||
| 008 | 770101s1977 xx |||| o ||| s eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (ERIC)ed136251 | ||
| 040 | |a ericd |c ericd |d MvI | ||
| 099 | |f ERIC DOC # |a ED136251 | ||
| 099 | |f ERIC DOC # |a ED136251 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Annis, Linda. | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Effect of Preferred or Nonpreferred Method of Study, Various Study Techniques, and Cognitive Style on Recall and Recognition |h [electronic resource] / |c Linda Annis and J. Kent Davis. |
| 260 | |a [S.l.] : |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, |c 1977. | ||
| 300 | |a 15 p. | ||
| 500 | |a ERIC Document Number: ED136251. | ||
| 500 | |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New York, New York, April 1977). |5 ericd. | ||
| 500 | |a Educational level discussed: Higher Education. | ||
| 520 | |a Field-independent and field-dependent college students studied a 1525-word article under a preferred or nonpreferred study condition (read only, underline, or note taking). Half of the subjects reviewed the material prior to an examination and half did not. Results indicated that field-independent subjects who used a nonpreferred study technique and reviewed generally produced the best recall and recognition scores, while field-dependent subjects performed better when using a preferred study technique and no review. The findings are discussed in terms of practical suggestions for students as well as implications for further research. (Author) | ||
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Cognitive Style. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Higher Education. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Learning Processes. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Memory. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Prose. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Reading Research. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Recall (Psychology) |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Review (Reexamination) |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Study Skills. |2 ericd. |
| 700 | 1 | |a Davis, J. Kent. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |z Full Text (via ERIC) |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED136251.pdf |
| 907 | |a .b63702204 |b 07-06-22 |c 10-15-10 | ||
| 998 | |a web |b 10-23-12 |c f |d m |e - |f eng |g xx |h 4 |i 1 | ||
| 956 | |a ERIC | ||
| 999 | f | f | |i b89815a3-29b6-5236-a6da-1b99d2369fdd |s cc4dc399-0e2e-58c8-9822-a6b9c247eb48 |
| 952 | f | f | |p Can circulate |a University of Colorado Boulder |b Online |c Online |d Online |e ED136251 |h Other scheme |i web |n 1 |