Are Sociology and Psychology Students Different in the Relationship of Attribution, Expectancy, Performance and Perceived Success to Study Strategies? [electronic resource] / Theodore A. Chandler and Carl J. Spies.

Undergraduate students in sociology (N=59) and psychology (N=50) participated in a study at a large midwestern university to determine if the pattern of attributional assignment, expectancy, performance, and perceived success was different in these two groups of undergraduates. Prior to taking the f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Chandler, Theodore A.
Other Authors: Spies, Carl J.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1987.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6355462
003 CoU
005 20080221101501.2
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 870101s1987 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed327091 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED327091 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED327091 
100 1 |a Chandler, Theodore A. 
245 1 0 |a Are Sociology and Psychology Students Different in the Relationship of Attribution, Expectancy, Performance and Perceived Success to Study Strategies?  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Theodore A. Chandler and Carl J. Spies. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1987. 
300 |a 6 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED327091. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Higher Education. 
520 |a Undergraduate students in sociology (N=59) and psychology (N=50) participated in a study at a large midwestern university to determine if the pattern of attributional assignment, expectancy, performance, and perceived success was different in these two groups of undergraduates. Prior to taking the first of three exams each student was asked how they expected to perform on the test. Before taking exams 2 and 3, they were questioned as to whether, based on the results of the first test, they did anything different in preparing for these exams. The results showed several differences between the two groups in relation to their preparation: of the eight changes in preparation strategies students had to choose from, the two groups differed in the use of five of them. Additionally, task, luck, and effort were the preferred attributions for the psychology students, while knowledge and ability where preferred by sociology students. The study demonstrated that the use of psychology students as representatives of all undergraduates is not justifiable. Nine references. (GLR) 
521 8 |a Researchers.  |b ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Attribution Theory.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a College Students.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Comparative Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Expectation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Experimental Groups.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Learning Strategies.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Notetaking.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Psychology.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Habits.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Sociology.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Student Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Student Motivation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Study Habits.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Test Results.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Test Wiseness.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Undergraduate Students.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Spies, Carl J. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED327091.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b63554628  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-14-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-24-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 08535877-279b-50f2-90c2-b56ff528cdf2  |s 6a2a254b-81cb-53cc-a21e-3b6670da51ca 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED327091  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1