Embedding Performance Appraisal within an Organizational Context [microform] / Lawrence H. Peters and Cathy J. Rudolf.

The literature on the partial determinants of performance in organizational contexts, particularly the research on situational determinants, suggests several different variables which may be of importance to appraisal processes as well. This point may be exemplified with regard to the situational fa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: Peters, Lawrence H.
Other Authors: Rudolf, Cathy J.
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1982.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6306699
003 CoU
007 he u||024||||
008 820801s1982 xx |||| b ||| | eng d
005 20240722192747.7
035 |a (ERIC)ed225085 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED225085 
100 1 |a Peters, Lawrence H. 
245 1 0 |a Embedding Performance Appraisal within an Organizational Context  |h [microform] /  |c Lawrence H. Peters and Cathy J. Rudolf. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1982. 
300 |a 16 p. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (90th, Washington, DC, August 23-27, 1982).  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED225085. 
520 |a The literature on the partial determinants of performance in organizational contexts, particularly the research on situational determinants, suggests several different variables which may be of importance to appraisal processes as well. This point may be exemplified with regard to the situational factors of task ease/difficulty and situational performance constraints. The importance of contextual factors for understanding the performance appraisal process and evaluating appraisal instruments is critical. The relevance of such contextual variables in the determination of the degree to which rating procedures are susceptible to halo and leniency errors must also be noted. When using contextual information in the evaluation of performance appraisal instruments, it will be necessary to first identify important situational characteristics which exert a strong influence on both mean levels and distributions of observed performance as well as other variables that impact on performance. (JAC) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
583 1 |a committed to retain  |c 20240101  |d 20490101  |5 CoU  |f Alliance Shared Trust  |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies 
650 0 7 |a Difficulty Level.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Employees.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Employers.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Evaluation Criteria.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Evaluation Methods.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Motivation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Organizational Climate.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Organizations (Groups)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Performance Factors.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Psychometrics.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Research Methodology.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a State of the Art Reviews.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Rudolf, Cathy J. 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b63066993  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-13-10 
998 |a pas  |b 10-14-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 34510617-8c6f-58d0-a770-c06b4263f5f1  |s c9767988-43d8-508d-9a7f-05049fd93064 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED225085  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1