Three Types of Schemata in Children's Recall of Cohesive and Noncohesive Text [microform] / Peter Mosenthal.

The assumption that "ideal" text grammars are valid descriptions of the schemata used by children to organize their recall of text was challenged in a study involving 150 elementary school children. The children, all with above-average reading ability, were classified as having one of thre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: Mosenthal, Peter
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1977.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6271831
003 CoU
007 he u||024||||
008 770101s1977 xx |||| b ||| s eng d
005 20240722205821.6
035 |a (ERIC)ed166637 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED166637 
100 1 |a Mosenthal, Peter. 
245 1 0 |a Three Types of Schemata in Children's Recall of Cohesive and Noncohesive Text  |h [microform] /  |c Peter Mosenthal. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1977. 
300 |a 26 p. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Toronto, Canada, March 27-31, 1978); Not available in hard copy due to marginal legibility of original document.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED166637. 
520 |a The assumption that "ideal" text grammars are valid descriptions of the schemata used by children to organize their recall of text was challenged in a study involving 150 elementary school children. The children, all with above-average reading ability, were classified as having one of three types of schemata: theme-initial (identifying the initial event of the text as the theme--the schemata used by adults), theme-final (identifying the final event of the text as the theme), and no-theme-structure (failing to use thematic structure to aid in prose processing). They then read and recalled 12 paragraphs representing the three schemata conditions. The results demonstrated that children's recall of text is a function of schemata structure as well as of text structure. The findings suggest that while ideal grammars may be valid descriptions for adults who share a common schemata, they are not always valid descriptions for children who have different schemata structures. (FL) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
583 1 |a committed to retain  |c 20240101  |d 2049101  |5 CoU  |f Alliance Shared Trust  |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies  
650 0 7 |a Adults.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Children.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Cognitive Processes.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Discourse Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Elementary Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Language Patterns.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Language Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Linguistics.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Reading Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Recall (Psychology)  |2 ericd. 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b62718319  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-12-10 
998 |a pas  |b 10-12-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i b7329d38-a1f2-56a0-b7e1-70cafee1e041  |s 4ebe8fd9-c34b-5431-bbdf-c2c45efd7de3 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED166637  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1