Does an Extra Year (Junior First Grade) Enhance Academic Ability and Self-Concept of Academic Ability? [electronic resource] / Mary Ann Boettger.

This study examined whether the educational practice of retaining students in junior first grade for a year between kindergarten and first grade enhanced their academic achievement and self-concept of academic ability. Subjects were 120 students randomly selected from a midwestern school district an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Boettger, Mary Ann
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1994.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6239559
003 CoU
005 20080220152027.4
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 940501s1994 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed376981 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED376981 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED376981 
100 1 |a Boettger, Mary Ann. 
245 1 0 |a Does an Extra Year (Junior First Grade) Enhance Academic Ability and Self-Concept of Academic Ability?  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Mary Ann Boettger. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1994. 
300 |a 68 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED376981. 
520 |a This study examined whether the educational practice of retaining students in junior first grade for a year between kindergarten and first grade enhanced their academic achievement and self-concept of academic ability. Subjects were 120 students randomly selected from a midwestern school district and divided equally into 4 groups: (1) recommended for first grade and placed in first grade; (2) recommended for junior first grade and placed in junior first; (3) recommended for junior first grade but placed in first grade; and (4) borderline between junior first grade and kindergarten, but placed in first grade. The groups were compared on 14 variables: (1) gender; (2) birth month; (3) retention; (4) absences; (5) lunch status; (6) class placement in mathematics; (7) grade point average in mathematics; (8) mathematics total on California Achievement Tests; (9) category of achievement in mathematics on the Michigan Educational Assessment Program; (10) class placement in reading; (11) grade point average in reading; (12) reading total on California Achievement Tests; (13) category of achievement in reading on the Michigan Educational Assessment Program; and (14) self-concept of academic ability. Males were retained in junior first grade at twice the number of females, and several variables were significantly different for the four groups, including self- concept of academic ability. Findings indicated that an extra year of junior first grade did not enhance academic achievement or self-concept of academic ability. (Contains a 49-item bibliography.) (WP) 
650 0 7 |a Academic Ability.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Academic Achievement.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Age Differences.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Attendance.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Class Rank.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Elementary School Students.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Grade Point Average.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Grade Repetition.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Grade 1.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Kindergarten.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Mathematics Achievement.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Predictor Variables.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Primary Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Achievement.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Self Concept.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Sex Differences.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Student Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Transitional Programs.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED376981.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b62395592  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-10-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-24-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 6912d0b9-72f1-5b0d-ae44-7dc8cdae94b1  |s 952063a4-bb49-53c2-93ed-048b9d41e35a 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED376981  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1