Suggested Topics within your search.
Showing 1 - 16 results of 16 for search 'At head of title: In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960, no. 9 original.', query time: 0.49s Refine Results
  1. 1
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al. : brief in support of exceptions of the United States, intervener, to the special master's report and recommended decree.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, et al. : brief in support of exceptions of the United States,...

    Published 1961
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, et al. : exceptions of the United States, intervener, to the special master's report and recommended decree.

    State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, et al. : exceptions of the United States, intervener, to the special master's report and recommended decree.

    Published 1961
    “…At head of title: No. 9 original, in the Supreme Court …”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before Honorable Simon H. Rifkind, special master : New Mexico's comments on the special master's report, May 5, 1960.

    State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : St...

    Published 1960
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : comments, suggestions, and motions of the California defendants re the Special Master's Draft report, dated May 5, 1960.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah,...

    Published 1960
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : comments of the State of Nevada on draft report of special master, dated May 5, 1960.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleade...

    Published 1960
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants : opening brief of the California defendants in support of their exceptions to the report of the special master.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah,...

    Published 1961
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : offer of proof and brief in support of offer : submitted by the California defendants, August 17, 1960, New York City, New York.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah,...

    Published 1960
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants : exceptions of the California defendants to the report of the special master.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water...

    Published 1960
    “…States, October term, 1960, no. 9 original.…”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded : opening brief for the state of Nevada, intervener.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water Dis...

    Published 1961
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : New Mexico's exceptions to the report and recommended decree of the Special Master, dated December 5, 1960.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, C...

    Published 1961
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : motion to reopen the trial for the taking of evidence re depletion of the Colorado River at Lee Ferry by the Upper Basin, and statement in support of motion.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah,...

    Published 1960
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded defendant : State of Utah, impleaded defendant : opening brief for Arizona /

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water Dist...

    Published 1961
    “…States, October term, 1960, no. 9 original.…”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : Arizona's motion for adoption, with exceptions, of the special master's report and recommended decree.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water Dist...

    Published 1961
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. state of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico impleaded defendant : State of Utah, impleaded defendant : Arizona's legislative history of sections 4(a), 5 (1st paragraph), and 8 of the Boulder Canyon Project Act.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. state of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water Dist...

    Published 1961
    “…States, October term, 1960, no. 9 original.…”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : exceptions to the report of the Special Master and recommended decree on file herein, dated December 5, 1960, filed by the defendant, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, on its behalf and on behalf of its codefendants, the City of Los Angeles, and its Department of Water and Power, the City of San Diego, and the County of San Diego.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water...

    Published 1961
    “…States, October term, 1960, no. 9 original.…”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : Simon H. Rifkind, special master : draft report

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water Dist...

    Published 1960
    “…At head of title: No. 9 original, in the Supreme Court …”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
Search Tools: RSS Feed – Save Search