-
1
Inadequate 10 CFR 72.48 safety evaluation of independent spent fuel storage installations
Published 1997“…Material Safety and Safeguards : U.S. Nuclear Regulatory …”
Online Access
Online Access
Government Document Electronic eBook -
2
Response to indications of potential tampering, vandalism, or malicious michief
Published 2008“…Reactor Regulation : U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, …”
Online Access
Online Access
Government Document Electronic eBook -
3
Excessively large criticality safety limits fail to provide double contingency at fuel cycle facility
Published 2005“…Reactor Regulation : U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, …”
Online Access
Online Access
Government Document Electronic eBook -
4
Inadequate test procedure fails to detect inoperable criticality accident alarm horns
Published 2005“…Reactor Regulation : U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, …”
Online Access
Online Access
Government Document Electronic eBook -
5
Use of less than optimal bounding assumptions in criticality safety analysis at fuel cycle facilities
Published 2004“…Reactor Regulation : U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, …”
Online Access
Online Access
Government Document Electronic eBook -
6
Licensee responsibility for quality assurance oversight of contractor activities regarding fabrication and use of spent fuel storage cask systems
Published 2000“…Material Safety and Safeguards : U.S. Nuclear Regulatory …”
Online Access
Online Access
Government Document Electronic eBook