Suggested Topics within your search.
Showing 1 - 20 results of 49 for search '"Indian reservations California"', query time: 0.07s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Objections of Claimants in Docket No. 295 to Proposed Findings of facts in Docket No. 283.

    Objections of Claimants in Docket No. 295 to Proposed Findings of facts in Docket No. 283.

    Published 1958
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    [Order Sustaining Petitioners' Motion of June 6, 1958; Opinion of the Commission; Order Fixing Time Oral Argument; Order Overruling Motions to Modify Decision of January 20, 1958;Order Dividing State of California Info Areas A and B; Order Denying Motions for Rehearing and Amending Finding of Fact No. 35]

    [Order Sustaining Petitioners' Motion of June 6, 1958; Opinion of the Commission; Order Fixing Time Oral Argument; Order Overruling Motions to Modify Decision of January 20, 1958;O...

    Published 1958
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Opinion of the Commissioners.

    Opinion of the Commissioners.

    Published 1958
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Answer of Petitioners in Docket No. 37 to Motion of Defendant Made on or About June 29, 1953 in Respect to Docket No. 100.

    Answer of Petitioners in Docket No. 37 to Motion of Defendant Made on or About June 29, 1953 in Respect to Docket No. 100.

    Published 1953
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    [Journal of the Indian Claims Commission: January 1956]

    [Journal of the Indian Claims Commission: January 1956]

    Published 1956
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    Notice of Appeal to The United States Court of Claims by the Claimants in Docket No. 295.

    Notice of Appeal to The United States Court of Claims by the Claimants in Docket No. 295.

    Published 1959
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Brief of United States on Preliminary Hearing.

    Brief of United States on Preliminary Hearing.

    Published 1954
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Response by Klamath and Modoc Tribes and Yahooskin Band of Snake Indians to Defendant's Motion to Consolidate or Abate Filed June 3, 1953.

    Response by Klamath and Modoc Tribes and Yahooskin Band of Snake Indians to Defendant's Motion to Consolidate or Abate Filed June 3, 1953.

    Published 1953
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    Memorandum Brief as to Motion and Brief of Defendant to Consolidate or Abate Pending Cases Relating to Claims on Lands in California.

    Memorandum Brief as to Motion and Brief of Defendant to Consolidate or Abate Pending Cases Relating to Claims on Lands in California.

    Published 1953
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Motion to Consolidate or to Abate.

    Motion to Consolidate or to Abate.

    Published 1953
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Response in Opposition by Petitioners in Docket No. 330 to Defendant's Motion to Consolidate or Abate Various Case Affecting Lands in California.

    Response in Opposition by Petitioners in Docket No. 330 to Defendant's Motion to Consolidate or Abate Various Case Affecting Lands in California.

    Published 1953
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    Response by Klamath and Modoc Tribes and Yahooskin Band of Snake Indians to Defendant's Motion to Consolidate or Abate Filed June 3, 1953.

    Response by Klamath and Modoc Tribes and Yahooskin Band of Snake Indians to Defendant's Motion to Consolidate or Abate Filed June 3, 1953.

    Published 1953
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Points and Authorities in Opposition to Motion to Consolidate or to Abate.

    Points and Authorities in Opposition to Motion to Consolidate or to Abate.

    Published 1953
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    Points and Authorities in Opposition to Motion to Consolidate or to Abate.

    Points and Authorities in Opposition to Motion to Consolidate or to Abate.

    Published 1953
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    Brief of United States of Preliminary Hearing.

    Brief of United States of Preliminary Hearing.

    Published 1954
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    [Brief of the Quechan or Yuma Tribe on the Issue of Representation; Memorandum of Pit River Indians of California on Right to Assert Tribal Claims]

    [Brief of the Quechan or Yuma Tribe on the Issue of Representation; Memorandum of Pit River Indians of California on Right to Assert Tribal Claims]

    Published 1957
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    Response in Opposition by Petitioners in Dockets No. 330 to Defendant's Motion to Consolidate or Abate Various Cases Affecting Lands in California.

    Response in Opposition by Petitioners in Dockets No. 330 to Defendant's Motion to Consolidate or Abate Various Cases Affecting Lands in California.

    Published 1953
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    Motion of Paul Jake, Et Al, on Behalf of the Southern. Paiute Nation of Indians (No. 330)for Leave to File Out of Time and Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Respond to Defendants Motion to Consolidate or Abate.

    Motion of Paul Jake, Et Al, on Behalf of the Southern. Paiute Nation of Indians (No. 330)for Leave to File Out of Time and Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Respond to Defen...

    Published 1953
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    [Brief of Petitioners in Dockets No. 31 and 37 on Preliminary Hearing; Brief of Petitioners in Dockets No . 31 and 37]

    [Brief of Petitioners in Dockets No. 31 and 37 on Preliminary Hearing; Brief of Petitioners in Dockets No . 31 and 37]

    Published 1954
    “…Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    [Journal of the Indian Claims Commission: April 1961]

    [Journal of the Indian Claims Commission: April 1961]

    Published 1961
    “…the Campo Indian Reservation, California.…”
    Full Text (via ProQuest)
    eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
Search Tools: RSS Feed – Save Search