Suggested Topics within your search.
Showing 1 - 13 results of 13 for search '"Los Angeles"', query time: 0.10s Refine Results
  1. 1
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : exceptions to the report of the Special Master and recommended decree on file herein, dated December 5, 1960, filed by the defendant, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, on its behalf and on behalf of its codefendants, the City of Los Angeles, and its Department of Water and Power, the City of San Diego, and the County of San Diego.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego,...

    Published 1961
    “…California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, …”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : reply to defendants' answer.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California,...

    Published 1953
    “…California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, …”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : New Mexico's exceptions to the report and recommended decree of the Special Master, dated December 5, 1960.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California,...

    Published 1961
    “…California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, …”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants : affidavit of services /

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego,... by Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995

    Published 1962
    “…California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, …”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1956, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : availability of Article III(b) waters for use in California : legislative history of section 4(a) of Boulder Canyon Project Act (limitation provision) : bills, amendments, and debates in chronological order : 70th Cong., 1st & 2d Sess. (1927-1928) : submitted by the California defendants.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1956, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego,...

    Published 1957
    “…California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, …”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California [and others], defendants : complainant's objections to motion on behalf of Sidney Kartus et al. for leave to file petition to intervene.

    State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California [and others], defendants : complainant's objections to motion on behalf of Sidney Kartus et al. for leave to file petition to i...

    Published 1953
    “…California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California …”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California [and others] defendants : motion of Colter Water Project Association, Incorporated, for leave to file brief amicus curiae.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California [and others] defendants : motion of Colter Water Project Association, Incorporated, for leave to file brief amicus curiae.

    Published 1952
    “…California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, …”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California [and others], defendants : United States of America, intervener : answer of California defendants to petition of intervention on behalf of the United States of America, and summary of the controversy (exhibit A).

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California [and others], defendants : United States of America, intervener : answer of California defendants to petition of intervention...

    Published 1954
    “…California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California …”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California [and others], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : motion on behalf of Navajo Tribe of Indians of the Navajo Reservation, Arizona, New Mexico and Utah, for leave to intervene, brief in support thereof, and petition of intervention.

    State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California [and others], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, i...

    Published 1961
    “…California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California …”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California [and others], defendants : motion on behalf of Sidney Kartus, successor to Fred T. Colter, applicant for and on behalf of the State of Arizona and water users under Glen-Bridge-Verde-Highline projects, and M.C. Augustine, Ione Dockstader, John R. Westberg, E.C. Hildebrand, R.H. Johnson, Joe L. Huerta, Hi-T Ranch Corporation, and Perry C. Green, Melvin A. Green, Harold S. Lauer, Judge Manor, I.F. Nelson, Addie V. Burton, Mary E. Schmid, and E.V. McDaniel, landholders under said projects, for leave to file petition to intervene /

    State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California [and others], defendants : motion on behalf of Sidney Kartus, successor to Fred T. Colter, applicant for and on behalf of the S...

    Published 1952
    “…California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California …”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California [and others], defendants : United States of America, intervener : memorandum of the California defendants in reply to memorandum of the United States requesting a pre-trial conference.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California [and others], defendants : United States of America, intervener : memorandum of the California defendants in reply to memoran...

    Published 1954
    “…California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California …”
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    Proceedings : joint meeting of the Committee of the States (Committee of Fourteen) and the Colorado Drainage Basin Committee of the National Resources Committee.

    Proceedings : joint meeting of the Committee of the States (Committee of Fourteen) and the Colorado Drainage Basin Committee of the National Resources Committee.

    Published 1939
    Government Document Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    The law of the Colorado River : a legal research guide /

    The law of the Colorado River : a legal research guide / by Liebert, Tobe

    Published 2022
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
Search Tools: RSS Feed – Save Search