Suggested Topics within your search.
Showing 1 - 20 results of 53 for search '', query time: 0.05s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Reissued patents comments on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Miller vs. the Bridgeport Brass Co. : practical effects of the decision, and its warning to inventors.

    Reissued patents comments on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Miller vs. the Bridgeport Brass Co. : practical effects of the decision, and its warning to inven... by Howson, Henry, 1823-1885

    Published 1882
    Full Text (via HeinOnline)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    Report of the argument of William Whiting, Esq., of Boston in the case of Artemas L. Brooks et al., vs. John Fisk and N.G. Norcross, upon the subject of Woodworth's planing machine : before the Supreme Court of the United States : George T. Curtis ... C.M. Keller ... for the complainants, William Whiting ... for the respondents.

    Report of the argument of William Whiting, Esq., of Boston in the case of Artemas L. Brooks et al., vs. John Fisk and N.G. Norcross, upon the subject of Woodworth's planing machine... by Whiting, William, 1813-1873, Curtis, George Ticknor, 1812-1894, Keller, C. M.

    Published 1854
    Microfilm Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Rumford Chemical Works, petitioner, against Hygienic Chemical Company of New Jersey, no. 9 on writ of certiorari to the United States of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Hygienic Chemical Company of New Jersey, James E. Heller and Adolph Hirsh, petitioners against Rumford Chemical Works, no. 121 no. 9 on writ of certiorari to the United States of Appeals for the Second Circuit

    Rumford Chemical Works, petitioner, against Hygienic Chemical Company of New Jersey, no. 9 on writ of certiorari to the United States of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Hygienic Che...

    Published 1910
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    The Michigan Southern & Northern Indiana Rail Road Company, appellant, vs. Samuel H. Turrill, appellee no. 143, October term, A.D., 1876.

    The Michigan Southern & Northern Indiana Rail Road Company, appellant, vs. Samuel H. Turrill, appellee no. 143, October term, A.D., 1876.

    Published 1876
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, November term, A.D. 1876, no. 143 the Michigan Southern & Northern Indiana Rail Road Company, appellant, vs. Samuel H. Turrill, appellee : brief for appellant.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, November term, A.D. 1876, no. 143 the Michigan Southern & Northern Indiana Rail Road Company, appellant, vs. Samuel H. Turrill, appellee...

    Published 1876
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    The Michigan Southern and Northern Indiana Rail Road Company, appellants, vs. Samuel H. Turrill appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.

    The Michigan Southern and Northern Indiana Rail Road Company, appellants, vs. Samuel H. Turrill appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illi...

    Published 1874
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Henry W. Putnam, appellant, vs. Charles G. Hutchinson appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois : filed October 7, 1882.

    Henry W. Putnam, appellant, vs. Charles G. Hutchinson appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois : filed October 7, 1882. by Putnam, Henry W.

    Published 1882
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    No. 668, the American Bell Telephone Co., et al., appellants, v. the Molecular Telephone Co., et al cross appeal in case no. 667, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York : brief for American Bell Telephone Co., et al., appellants.

    No. 668, the American Bell Telephone Co., et al., appellants, v. the Molecular Telephone Co., et al cross appeal in case no. 667, from the Circuit Court of the United States for th...

    Published 1886
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, the Bate Refrigerating Company, appellant, vs. George H. Hammond & Co. no. 862 substituted for no. 145 : argument in support of position taken by appellees.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, the Bate Refrigerating Company, appellant, vs. George H. Hammond & Co. no. 862 substituted for no. 145 : argument in support of position...

    Published 1889
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Bate Refrigerating Company, complainant and appellant, vs. Ferdinand Sulzberger, Samuel Weil and Frederick Joseph, doing business under the firm name of Schwarzchild & Sulzberger, defendants and appellees, no. 1184 motion to advance said cause and to permit oral argument.

    Bate Refrigerating Company, complainant and appellant, vs. Ferdinand Sulzberger, Samuel Weil and Frederick Joseph, doing business under the firm name of Schwarzchild & Sulzberger,...

    Published 1894
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    The Bate Refrigerating Company, appellant, vs. Ferdinand Sulzberger, Samuel Weil and Frederick Joseph, doing business under the firm name of Schwarzchild & Sulzberger on a certificate from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, filed April 6, 1894.

    The Bate Refrigerating Company, appellant, vs. Ferdinand Sulzberger, Samuel Weil and Frederick Joseph, doing business under the firm name of Schwarzchild & Sulzberger on a certific...

    Published 1894
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    The Bate Refrigerating Company, appellant, vs. Ferdinand Sulzberger, et al., appellees brief on behalf of the Harrison International Telephone Company, filed by leave of court.

    The Bate Refrigerating Company, appellant, vs. Ferdinand Sulzberger, et al., appellees brief on behalf of the Harrison International Telephone Company, filed by leave of court.

    Published 1894
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    The Clay Commercial Telephone Co. et al., appellants, vs. American Bell Telephone Co. et al. appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania : brief for appellants.

    The Clay Commercial Telephone Co. et al., appellants, vs. American Bell Telephone Co. et al. appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylv...

    Published 1881
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    The Coca-Cola Company, petitioner, v. the Koke Company of America, et al. on writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (December 6, 1920)

    The Coca-Cola Company, petitioner, v. the Koke Company of America, et al. on writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (December 6, 192...

    Published 1923
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    The Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, appellants, vs. Samuel H. Turrill appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.

    The Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, appellants, vs. Samuel H. Turrill appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.

    Published 1874
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    The electric telegraph substance of the argument of S.P. Chase, before the Supreme Court of the United States for the appellants in the case of H. O'Reilly and others vs. S.F.B. Morse and others : on appeal from the Circuit Court for the district of Kentucky.

    The electric telegraph substance of the argument of S.P. Chase, before the Supreme Court of the United States for the appellants in the case of H. O'Reilly and others vs. S.F.B. Mo... by Chase, Salmon P. (Salmon Portland), 1808-1873

    Published 1853
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1870, the United States, appellants, vs. William W. Hubbell, no. 497, William W. Hubbell, appellant, vs. the United States, no. 498 brief for the United States on motion to remand these cases to the Court of Claims.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, December term, 1870, the United States, appellants, vs. William W. Hubbell, no. 497, William W. Hubbell, appellant, vs. the United States...

    Published 1870
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    William Smith, appellant, vs. Nathan Nichols appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Massachusetts.

    William Smith, appellant, vs. Nathan Nichols appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Massachusetts. by Smith, William

    Published 1871
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    Twenty years' war against the railroads

    Twenty years' war against the railroads by Whiting, William, 1813-1873

    Published 1860
    Full Text (via HeinOnline)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    The telephone appeals

    The telephone appeals by Dickerson, E. N. (Edward Nicoll), 1824-1889

    Published 1887
    Full Text (via Gale)
    Electronic eBook
    Save to List
    Saved in:
Search Tools: RSS Feed – Save Search