Suggested Topics within your search.
Showing 21 - 40 results of 45 for search '', query time: 0.15s Refine Results
  1. 21
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the California defendants : in three volumes : volume I.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irri...

    Published 1959
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 22
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : supplement and amendment to Imperial Irrigation District's form of "decree of court" as heretofore and herewith submitted.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah,...

    Published 1963
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 23
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded, before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : tentative outline of witnesses for Arizona.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water Dis...

    Published 1955
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 24
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : response of the States of Colorado, Wyoming, Utah and New Mexico to motion of the United States of America for determination of questions of law prior to determination of joinder motion.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water Dis...

    Published 1955
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 25
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : [transcript of arguments]

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water Dis...

    Published 1962
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 26
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : New Mexico's exceptions to the report and recommended decree of the Special Master, dated December 5, 1960.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, C...

    Published 1961
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 27
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : pre-trial order.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah,...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 28
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : amended and supplemental statement of position by complainant, State of Arizona.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded...

    Published 1957
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 29
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants : proposals for articles I(G), (H), II(B)(2), II(B)(4), II(B)(7) of decree : submitted by State of California : in which join the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, County of San Diego, Coachella Valley County Water District, and Palo Verde Irrigation District : December 18, 1963.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah,...

    Published 1963
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 30
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : answer of California defendants to appearance and statement in behalf of New Mexico of its claim of interest in and to Lower Basin waters, and : interrogatories addressed to the State of New Mexico by the California defendants.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party :...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 31
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : States of New Mexico and Utah, impleaded : statement of position of New Mexico.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water Dis...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 32
    State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : Arizona's comments on the draft report and recommended decree.

    State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexic...

    Published 1960
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 33
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, no. 8 original, October term 1963 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : States of Utah and New Mexico, impleaded defendants : petition of Imperial Irrigation District for rehearing : with supporting material.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, no. 8 original, October term 1963 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irri...

    Published 1963
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 34
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, impleaded defendants : closing brief of Imperial Irrigation District.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water...

    Published 1961
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 35
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : Arizona's objections to findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by other parties.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded...

    Published 1959
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 36
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and opening brief of the State of Arizona.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah,...

    Published 1959
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 37
    [Order denying petitions for rehearing : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : States of Utah and New Mexico, impleaded defendants].

    [Order denying petitions for rehearing : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley Coun...

    Published 1963
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 38
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : brief of the California defendants to accompany their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law : in two volumes : volume two : appendices.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irri...

    Published 1959
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 39
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : brief of the California defendants to accompany their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law : in two volumes : volume one.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irri...

    Published 1959
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 40
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : exceptions to the report of the Special Master and recommended decree on file herein, dated December 5, 1960, filed by the defendant, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, on its behalf and on behalf of its codefendants, the City of Los Angeles, and its Department of Water and Power, the City of San Diego, and the County of San Diego.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water...

    Published 1961
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
Search Tools: RSS Feed – Save Search