Suggested Topics within your search.
Showing 1 - 20 results of 130 for search 'Supreme Court.', query time: 0.21s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Supreme Court rules 1986, annotated.

    Supreme Court rules 1986, annotated.

    Published 1986
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1963 : no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded defendant, State of Utah, impleaded defendant : statement by Arizona on decree proposed by the United States.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1963
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : comments on Arizona's proposed specification of issues : submitted by the California defendants.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1956, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : availability of Article III(b) waters for use in California : legislative history of section 4(a) of Boulder Canyon Project Act (limitation provision) : bills, amendments, and debates in chronological order : 70th Cong., 1st & 2d Sess. (1927-1928) : submitted by the California defendants.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1956,...

    Published 1957
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, party : State of Utah, party : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : interrogatories addressed to the intervener, the United States of America, by the California defendants : set no. 1.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded : reply brief for the State of Nevada, intervener.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1961,...

    Published 1961
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, Nevada : volume I.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1958
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : opening statement on behalf of the intervening State of Nevada.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1955,...

    Published 1958
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1958, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : brief relating to findings of fact and conclusions of law, Nevada : volume II.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1958
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants ; United States of America, intervener ; State of Nevada, intervener ; State of New Mexico, impleaded ; State of Utah, impleaded : the State of Nevada's exceptions to the report of Special Master, Simon H. Rifkind, dated December 5, 1960; and the recommended decree included therein.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1960,...

    Published 1961
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants to require further answers of the State of New Mexico to interrogatories, and brief of the California defendants in support thereof.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : brief of the California defendants in response to objections by the United States to interrogatories : sets numbers 1 and 2 : and motion to require further answers.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : memorandum of the California defendants in clarification of interrogatories to the United States : and resubmitted interrogatories.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : memorandum re rule 43(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "Record of Excluded Evidence" : submitted by the California defendants.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : interrogatories addressed to the complainant, the State of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 4.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for an order relating to rights of the parties to interview government officials and employees.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for production of documents by the United States of America.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : notice of supplemental motion, and supplemental motion of the California defendants to strike certain exhibits introduced by the complainant, State of Arizona.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for production of document by the State of Arizona.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants to strike certain exhibits introduced by the complainant, State of Arizona.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term,...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
Search Tools: RSS Feed – Save Search