Suggested Topics within your search.
Showing 41 - 60 results of 185 for search '', query time: 0.20s Refine Results
  1. 41
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : memorandum of the California defendants in clarification of interrogatories to the United States : and resubmitted interrogatories.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Ir...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 42
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : memorandum re rule 43(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "Record of Excluded Evidence" : submitted by the California defendants.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Ir...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 43
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : interrogatories addressed to the complainant, the State of Arizona, by the California defendants : set no. 4.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Ir...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 44
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for an order relating to rights of the parties to interview government officials and employees.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Ir...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 45
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for production of documents by the United States of America.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Ir...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 46
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : notice of supplemental motion, and supplemental motion of the California defendants to strike certain exhibits introduced by the complainant, State of Arizona.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Ir...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 47
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants for production of document by the State of Arizona.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Ir...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 48
    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : notice of motion, and motion of the California defendants to strike certain exhibits introduced by the complainant, State of Arizona.

    In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Ir...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 49
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.] defendants, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : answers to interrogatories propounded to the State of Nevada by the California defendants.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.] defendants, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, St...

    Published 1955
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 50
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded : opening brief for the state of Nevada, intervener.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water Dis...

    Published 1961
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 51
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : reply brief of the State of Nevada.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleade...

    Published 1959
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 52
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : states of New Mexico and Utah, impleaded : response of State of Arizona to complaint and answer by the State of Utah.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : states of New Mexico and Utah...

    Published 1955
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 53
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded, State of Utah, impleaded : complainant's amended response to appearance and statement of New Mexico.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded,...

    Published 1957
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 54
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : Arizona's answering brief.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded...

    Published 1959
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 55
    State of Arizona v. State of California, et al. : rejoinder of defendants to complainant's reply to defendants' answer.

    State of Arizona v. State of California, et al. : rejoinder of defendants to complainant's reply to defendants' answer.

    Published 1953
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 56
    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : Arizona's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

    State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded...

    Published 1959
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 57
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : motion on behalf of the California defendants for leave to file an amended answer to the bill of complaint of Arizona, and amendatory answer.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : motion on behalf of the Calif...

    Published 1954
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 58
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : response of California defendants to the motion on behalf of the State of Nevada for leave to intervene, and answer of California defendants to petition of intervention on behalf of the State of Nevada.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : response of California defendants to the motion on behalf o...

    Published 1954
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 59
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : motion to join, as parties, the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : motion to join, as parties, t...

    Published 1954
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 60
    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of Utah, party : State of New Mexico, party : answer of California defendants to complaint and answer in intervention by the State of Utah, and : interrogatories addressed to the State of Utah by the California defendants.

    State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of Utah, party : State...

    Published 1956
    Book
    Save to List
    Saved in:
Search Tools: RSS Feed – Save Search