Constitutional precedent in US Supreme Court reasoning /

Constitutional precedent in US Supreme Court reasoning / David Schultz.

Show other versions (2)

"Precedent is an important tool of judicial decision making and reasoning in civil law systems such as the United States. Instead of having each court decide cases anew, the rule of precedent or stares decisis dictates that similar cases should be decided similarly. Adherence to precedent promo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schultz, David A. (David Andrew), 1958- (Author)
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA : Edward Elgar Publishing, [2022]
Subjects:
United States. > Supreme Court > Rules and practice.
États-Unis. > Supreme Court > Règlements et procédure.
United States. > Supreme Court.
Stare decisis > United States.
Judicial process > United States.
Law > United States > Methodology.
Constitutional history > United States.
Stare decisis > États-Unis.
Processus judiciaire > États-Unis.
Droit > États-Unis > Méthodologie.
Histoire constitutionnelle > États-Unis.
Constitutional history.
Judicial process.
Law > Methodology.
Stare decisis.
United States.
Rules.
Table of Contents:
  • Introduction: The nature of legal precedent in American law
  • Jay to Vinson Courts
  • The Warren Court
  • The Burger Court
  • The Rehnquist Court
  • The Roberts Court.

Similar Items