In the Supreme Court of the United States, Matthew T. Albence, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al., petitioners, v. Maria Angelica Guzman Chavez, et al [electronic resource] : on petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit : reply brief for the petitioners / Noel J. Francisco, counsel of record.
At issue is which of two provisions of the Immigration and Nationalization Act applies to aliens facing reinstated removal proceedings: under one provision, they face mandatory detention until their case is decided, while under the other they may seek temporary freedom from detention.
Saved in:
| Online Access: |
Full Text (via HeinOnline) |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Corporate Authors: | , |
| Other Authors: | , |
| Other title: | Matthew T. Albence, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al., petitioners, v. Maria Angelica Guzman Chavez, et al. HeinOnline index title: Reply of petitioners Albence, Dir. of U.S. Immigration, et al. HeinOnline immigration law & policy in the U.S. |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[United States] :
[publisher not identified],
2020.
|
| Subjects: |
| Summary: | At issue is which of two provisions of the Immigration and Nationalization Act applies to aliens facing reinstated removal proceedings: under one provision, they face mandatory detention until their case is decided, while under the other they may seek temporary freedom from detention. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | "No. 19-897." "May 2020"--Page 7. |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (iii, 7 pages) |
| Source of Description, Etc. Note: | Description based on PDF title page, viewed July 11, 2021. |