In the Supreme Court of the United States, Matthew T. Albence, et al., petitioners, v. Maria Angelica Guzman Chavez, et al [electronic resource] : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit : brief for the petitioners / Jeffrey B. Wall, counsel of record [and 5 others].

At issue is which of two provisions of the Immigration and Nationalization Act applies to aliens facing reinstated removal proceedings: under one provision, they face mandatory detention until their case is decided, while under the other they may seek temporary freedom from detention.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via HeinOnline)
Main Author: Wall, Jeffrey B. (Author)
Corporate Authors: United States. Supreme Court, United States. Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
Other Authors: Albence, Matthew T. (petitioner.), Guzman Chavez, Maria Angelica (Respondent)
Other title:In the Supreme Court of the United States, Tony H. Pham, et al., petitioners, v. Maria Angelica Guzman Chavez, et al., respondents.
HeinOnline index title: Brief of petitioners Matthew T. Albence, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.
HeinOnline immigration law & policy in the U.S.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [Washington, District of Columbia?] : [United States Department of Justice?], [2020]
Subjects:
Description
Summary:At issue is which of two provisions of the Immigration and Nationalization Act applies to aliens facing reinstated removal proceedings: under one provision, they face mandatory detention until their case is decided, while under the other they may seek temporary freedom from detention.
Item Description:"No. 19-897."
"August 2020"--Page 39.
Physical Description:1 online resource (VI, 39, 79a pages)
Bibliography:"Table of authorities"--Pages IV-VII.