Decision of the court and argument of Wm. M. Evarts, Esq., of New York City in the Supreme Court of the United States delivered at Washington Feb. 5, 1866 [electronic resource] : G. Clarence Churchill and others, plaintiffs in error vs. the City of Utica, defendant in error, no. 286.

Similar Items

• A history of the libel suit of Clarence H. Venner against August Belmont how a plaintiff who had been called a practical blackmailer discontinued his suit for libel when confronted with an order for his examination as to the truth of the charge.
  Published: (1913)
• Arguments of the Counsel of Trinity Church, before the Senate Committee
  by: Ogden, Gouverneur M. (Gouverneur Morris), 1809?-1884
  Published: (1857)
• Joseph H. Foote, plaintiff in error, against the beople of the State of New York, defendants in error case & exceptions /
  by: Foote, Joseph H.
  Published: (1873)
• Argument of John K. Porter, counsel for the disfranchised corporators of Trinity Church delivered before the select committee of the Senate in March 2, 1857 at Albany /
  by: Porter, John K. (John Kilham), 1819-1892
  Published: (1857)
• Superior Court, of the city of New York, Joseph Fagnan against Charles Knox
  Published: (1875)