State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : [transcript of arguments]

Transcript of oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States on January 8-11, 1962. Attorneys presenting arguments were Stanley Mosk, Northcutt Ely, Mark Wilmer, Charles H. Reed, Archibald Cox, R.P. Parry, Dennis McCarthy, Earl E. Hartley, Claude S. Mann.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors: Arizona (Complainant), California (Defendant), Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.) (Defendant), Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.) (Defendant), Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.) (Defendant), Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.) (Defendant), Los Angeles (Calif.) (Defendant), San Diego (Calif.) (Defendant), San Diego County (Calif.) (Defendant), United States (intervener.), Nevada (intervener.), New Mexico (impleaded defendant.), Utah (impleaded defendant.), United States. Supreme Court
Other Authors: Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Wilmer, Mark, Reed, Charles H., Cox, Archibald, 1912-2004, Parry, R. P., McCarthy, Dennis, Hartley, Earl E., Mann, Claud S.
Other title:At head of title: In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1961.
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1961 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : [transcript of arguments]
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1961 : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : [transcript of arguments]
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1961, no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : [transcript of arguments]
Transcript of oral argument before the Supreme Court the United States on January 8-11, 1962, Arizona v. California.
[Transcript of arguments], Arizona v. California.
[Transcript of arguments], Arizona v. California (Online)
Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Arizona vs. California.
Arizona v. California collection.
Arizona v. California collection : transcript of arguments.
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C. : Ward & Paul, [1962]
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 4500
001 lb621248
003 CoU-L
008 920817s1962 dcu 000 0 eng d
005 20240201220432.8
035 |a (OCoLC)83908900 
035 |a .b6212487  |b multi  |c - 
040 |a NNC-L  |c ZCL  |d OCLCQ  |d UCX  |d UtOrBLW 
043 |a n-mx---  |a n-usp-- 
049 |a UCXA 
090 |a KF5590.C6  |b A57555 1962 Transcript 
110 1 |a Arizona,  |e complainant.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79034873 
245 1 0 |a State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants :  |b United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : [transcript of arguments] 
246 1 |i At head of title:  |a In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1961. 
246 3 3 |a In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1961 :  |b State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : [transcript of arguments] 
246 3 3 |a In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1961 :  |b State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : [transcript of arguments] 
246 3 3 |a In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1961, no. 8 original :  |b State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : State of New Mexico, impleaded : State of Utah, impleaded : [transcript of arguments] 
246 3 3 |a Transcript of oral argument before the Supreme Court the United States on January 8-11, 1962, Arizona v. California. 
246 3 3 |a [Transcript of arguments], Arizona v. California. 
246 3 |a [Transcript of arguments], Arizona v. California (Online) 
246 3 3 |a Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963) 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b Ward & Paul,  |c [1962] 
300 |a 605 leaves ;  |c 29 cm 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a Cover title. 
500 |a "No. 8 original." 
500 |a "Following preparation of the original transcript of the oral argument, Arizona v. California, suggested corrections were solicited from all parties. The transcripts being forwarded herewith are copies embodying only corrections submitted on the part of the States of California and Utah and by Mr. George Reed on behalf of the State of Arizona. Corrections have not been submitted on behalf of: State of Nevada; State of New Mexico; Mr. Wilmer, State of Arizona; Solicitor General of the United States. Very truly yours, Ward & Paul, Reporters, March 2, 1962."--Cover letter inside front cover of [Volume 1] 
500 |a Consecutively paged transcript is divided into 4 sections that are called "volumes," but bound as 1 physical volume. 
520 |a Transcript of oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States on January 8-11, 1962. Attorneys presenting arguments were Stanley Mosk, Northcutt Ely, Mark Wilmer, Charles H. Reed, Archibald Cox, R.P. Parry, Dennis McCarthy, Earl E. Hartley, Claude S. Mann. 
520 |a Case summary: "Arizona v. California was a 12-year epic battle including three years of trial in front of a special master appointed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial involved 106 witnesses and hundreds of volumes of exhibits, ultimately producing a 433-page final report from the Master in December of 1960. Proceedings at the U.S. Supreme Court required two oral arguments, producing a 5-3 decision in 1963 with two dissenting opinions, with the majority opinion implemented by a decree in 1964. The case was an original action in the U.S. Supreme Court, with Arizona seeking to clarify its rights to the use of Colorado River basin water. It was filed 30 years after the seven basin states drafted the Colorado River Compact, which apportioned the waters of the basin roughly equally between the states of the Upper and Lower Divisions, but did not apportion shares to individual states. In addition to Arizona and California, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah were party to the case because they had lands located within the Lower Basin. The United States was also party to the case because of the federal water projects and lands located within the Lower Basin. It was perhaps the most high profile water case ever to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court and produced considerable commentary."-- Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Arizona v. California Revisited, 52 Nat. Resources J. 363, 365-66 (2012) (quoted with permission of the author) 
524 |a Citation: Transcript of Oral Argument Before the Supreme Court the United States on January 8-11, 1962, Arizona v. California, No. 8 Original, 1961 Term (dated Mar. 2, 1962) 
524 |a Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963) 
650 0 |a Water rights  |z Southwest, New. 
650 0 |a Water-supply  |z Southwest, New. 
650 0 |a Water consumption  |z Southwest, New. 
651 0 |a Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)  |x Water rights. 
730 0 |a Arizona vs. California. 
730 0 |a Arizona v. California collection. 
730 0 |a Arizona v. California collection : transcript of arguments. 
700 1 |a Mosk, Stanley,  |d 1912-2001.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no91000191  |1 http://isni.org/isni/0000000038973159 
700 1 |a Ely, Northcutt,  |d 1903-1997.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n89628798  |1 http://isni.org/isni/0000000082027741 
700 1 |a Wilmer, Mark.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2007002460  |1 http://isni.org/isni/000000004011656X 
700 1 |a Reed, Charles H.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nr92044878 
700 1 |a Cox, Archibald,  |d 1912-2004.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79111486  |1 http://isni.org/isni/0000000114881361 
700 1 |a Parry, R. P. 
700 1 |a McCarthy, Dennis.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n77019014 
700 1 |a Hartley, Earl E. 
700 1 |a Mann, Claud S. 
710 1 |a California,  |e defendant.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79041717  |1 http://isni.org/isni/0000000121800988 
710 2 |a Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.),  |e defendant.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82200232 
710 1 |a Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.),  |e defendant.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82054971 
710 1 |a Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.),  |e defendant.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79054027 
710 1 |a Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.),  |e defendant.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n80158367  |1 http://isni.org/isni/0000000121164707 
710 1 |a Los Angeles (Calif.),  |e defendant.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79021240 
710 1 |a San Diego (Calif.),  |e defendant.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79056560 
710 1 |a San Diego County (Calif.),  |e defendant.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006415 
710 1 |a United States,  |e intervener.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n78095330 
710 1 |a Nevada,  |e intervener.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79072716 
710 1 |a New Mexico,  |e impleaded defendant.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79005595 
710 1 |a Utah,  |e impleaded defendant.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79021759 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848  |1 http://isni.org/isni/000000012176610X 
902 |a 220725 
944 |a MARS - RDA ENRICHED 
945 |l llawp  |u v.electronic 
945 |l lst1  |u v.Part 1 
945 |l lst1  |u v.Part 2 
945 |l lst1  |u v.Part 3 
945 |l lst1  |u v.Part 4 
994 |a (2)lst1  |a (2)llawp 
999 f f |i 48245dd1-b6e9-55e5-aa98-1e69ddba7042  |s 93be3c8c-e1b6-51db-bd3e-3b76a7bacace 
999 |b 4  |c 130719  |d m  |e a  |f -  |g 0 
952 f f |p Cannot circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Law Campus  |c Law  |d Law Library - Stacks 1st floor  |e KF5590.C6 A57555 1962 Transcript  |h Library of Congress classification  |i journal  |j Part 4  |m U182004722214  |n 1 
952 f f |p Cannot circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Law Campus  |c Law  |d Law Library - Stacks 1st floor  |e KF5590.C6 A57555 1962 Transcript  |h Library of Congress classification  |i journal  |j Part 2  |m U182004722183  |n 1 
952 f f |p Cannot circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Law Campus  |c Law  |d Law Library - Stacks 1st floor  |e KF5590.C6 A57555 1962 Transcript  |h Library of Congress classification  |i journal  |j Part 1  |m U182004722206  |n 1 
952 f f |p Cannot circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Law Campus  |c Law  |d Law Library - Stacks 1st floor  |e KF5590.C6 A57555 1962 Transcript  |h Library of Congress classification  |i journal  |j Part 3  |m U182004722175  |n 1