Martin Pickett's heirs, plaintiffs in error, versus Samuel Legerwood et al. in error to the Circuit Court United States for the district of Kentucky.

Martin Pickett's heirs, plaintiffs in error, versus Samuel Legerwood et al. [electronic resource] : in error to the Circuit Court United States for the district of Kentucky.

Show other versions (9449)

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Online Access:	Full Text (via Gale)
Main Author:	Legerwood, Samuel
Corporate Author:	United States. Supreme Court
Other Authors:	Scott, John
Other title:	Pickett's heirs vs. Legerwood et al. MOML trials online.
Format:	Electronic eBook
Language:	English
Published:	[U.S.?] : [publisher not identified], [1831?]
Subjects:	Pickett, Martin > Will. Legerwood, Samuel > Trials, litigation, etc. Mitchell, William > Trials, litigation, etc. Henderson, William > Trials, litigation, etc. Roseberry, Hugh > Trials, litigation, etc. Graves, John > Trials, litigation, etc. Scott, John > Trials, litigation, etc. Inheritance and succession > United States. Landlord and tenant > United States.

The arguments of Gerrit Smith and David J. Mitchell, and the charge of Justice Mason, in a trial for murder

The arguments of Gerrit Smith and David J. Mitchell, and the charge of Justice Mason, in a trial for murder by Smith, Gerrit, 1797-1874

Published 2007

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

Report of the trial of Daniel H. Corey, on an indictment for the murder of Mrs. Matilda Nash at the term of the Superior Court of Judicature, holden at Keene, in the county of Cheshire, on the first Tuesday of October, A.D. 1830 /

Report of the trial of Daniel H. Corey, on an indictment for the murder of Mrs. Matilda Nash at the term of the Superior Court of Judicature, holden at Keene, in the county of Ches...

Published 2007

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

Judgment delivered in the General Division of the High Court of Rhodesia, at Salisbury, on Friday, 9th September, 1966, in the matters between (1) Stella Madzimbamuto, applicant, and Desmond William Lardner-Burke, in his capacity as minister of justice and of law and order, first respondent : and Frederick Phillip George, in his capacity as superintendent of Gwelo Prison, second respondent, (2) Leo Solomon Baron, applicant, and Norman Ayre, in his capacity as the officer in charge of Que Que Prison, first respondent, and Hendrik Stephanus Benzuidenhout, in his capacity as director of prisons, second respondent : and Clifford Walter Dupont, third respondent, and Desmond William Lardner-Burke, fourth respondent, alternatively Desmond William Lardner-Burke, in his capacity as minister of justice and of law and order, fifth respondent

Judgment delivered in the General Division of the High Court of Rhodesia, at Salisbury, on Friday, 9th September, 1966, in the matters between (1) Stella Madzimbamuto, applicant, a...

Published 1966

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

The application of Rebecka Peters, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated who are members of the Williamsburg Community Association, petitioner-appellant, against the New York City Housing Authority, respondent for an order pursuant to article 78 of the civil practice act annulling and declaring null and void a certain resolution of the respondent adopted December 11, 1952 : Joseph Seata, Carlos Dore and Joseph Feldman, on behalf of themselves individually and as members of the International Workers Order Inc., and as tenants of the New York City Housing Authority, intervenors-appellants : brief for petitioners.

The application of Rebecka Peters, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated who are members of the Williamsburg Community Association, petitioner-appellant, agai... by Peters, Rebecka

Published 1954

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

The application of Rebecka Peters, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated who are members of the Williamsburg Community Association, petitioner-appellant, against the New York City Housing Authority, respondent for an order pursuant to article 78 of the civil practice act annulling and declaring null and void a certain resolution of the respondent adopted December 11, 1952 : Joseph Seata, Carlos Dore and Joseph Feldman, on behalf of themselves individually and as members of the International Workers Order Inc., and as tenants of the New York City Housing Authority, intervenors-appellants : brief for respondents.

The application of Rebecka Peters, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated who are members of the Williamsburg Community Association, petitioner-appellant, agai...

Published 1954

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

Montgomery Building and Construction Trades Council et al., petitioner, Ledbetter Erection Company, Inc., respondent brief for petitioners.

Montgomery Building and Construction Trades Council et al., petitioner, Ledbetter Erection Company, Inc., respondent brief for petitioners.

Published 1952

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

Montgomery Building and Construction Trades Council et al., petitioner, Ledbetter Erection Company, Inc., respondent brief for respondent.

Montgomery Building and Construction Trades Council et al., petitioner, Ledbetter Erection Company, Inc., respondent brief for respondent.

Published 1952

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

Teeval Co., respondent, v. Stern, petitioner brief for petitioner.

Teeval Co., respondent, v. Stern, petitioner brief for petitioner. by Stern

Published 1950

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

Teeval Co., respondent, v. Stern, petitioner brief for respondent.

Teeval Co., respondent, v. Stern, petitioner brief for respondent.

Published 1950

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

United States of America, appellant, v. Joseph E. McWilliams, et al. on appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

United States of America, appellant, v. Joseph E. McWilliams, et al. on appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia. by McWilliams, Joseph Ellsberry

Published 1947

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

Daniel O'Regan, plaintiff, vs. Julian H. Schermerhorn, et al., defendants, William George, plaintiff, vs. Julian H. Schermerhorn, et al., defendants actions at law, on plaintiffs' motion to strike defendants' answers and defendants' cross-motion to strike complaints, argued before Ackerson, C.C.J. : memorandum of defendants.

Daniel O'Regan, plaintiff, vs. Julian H. Schermerhorn, et al., defendants, William George, plaintiff, vs. Julian H. Schermerhorn, et al., defendants actions at law, on plaintiffs'... by O'Regan, Daniel T. (Daniel Thomas), 1883-1954

Published 1945

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

Esquire, incorporated, appellant, v. Frank C. Walker, as Postmaster General of the United States, appellee appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

Esquire, incorporated, appellant, v. Frank C. Walker, as Postmaster General of the United States, appellee appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of C...

Published 1945

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

Before His Excellency, Charles Edison, governor of the state of New Jersey, in the matter of the investigation of the Hudson County Board of Taxation and into the conduct of Patrick A. Monahan, George Scheetz, John Rotherham, Alexander Sullivan, and Harry E. Bischoff, the members thereof brief of City Affairs Committee.

Before His Excellency, Charles Edison, governor of the state of New Jersey, in the matter of the investigation of the Hudson County Board of Taxation and into the conduct of Patric...

Published 1943

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

Court of Appeals, state of New York, in the matter of the application of Joseph P. McLaughlin, petitioner-appellant, against William Wilson, commissioner of the Department of Housing and Buildings of the City of New York, Joseph D. McGoldrick and Almerindo Portfolio, comptroller and treasurer, respectively, of the city of New York, defendants-respondents, in the matter of John H. Newman, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents, in the matter of Henry C. Wist, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents, in the matter of Alexander Newman, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents, in the matter of Edmund F. Konrady, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents, in the matter of George J. Northrup, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents, in the matter of August Nebgen, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents, in the matter of Charles J. Falk, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents, in the matter of Anthony A. McNally, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents, in the matter of John E. Manion, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents, in the matter of Louis Sweet, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents, in the matter of Charles Zoufaly, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents, in the matter of William Bartow, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents, in the matter of John J. Lundon, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents, in the matter of Harry P. Wasserman, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents, in the matter of Harold U. Lockwood, petitioner-appellant, against the same, defendants-respondents notice of motion to dismiss appeals for want of jurisdiction with affidavit and supporting brief.

Court of Appeals, state of New York, in the matter of the application of Joseph P. McLaughlin, petitioner-appellant, against William Wilson, commissioner of the Department of Housi...

Published 1943

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

In the District Court of the United States for the district of New Jersey, April term 1943, United States of America vs. Fritz Schroeder, German-American Vocational League, Inc., otherwise known as Deutsch-Amerikanische Berufsgemeinschaft, or D.A.B., D.A.B. Recreational Resort, Inc., Fred Buttig, Joseph Lieblein, Otto Greiner, Hans Flohr, Emil Socha, Theodore Koehn, Gustave Schmidt, Hermann Gastreich, Albert Kiesler, Karl T. Marx, John Kobbe, Karl Kranz, Otto Bremer, Walter Schall, Herman Warth, Fritz Zeglin, Kurt Beyer, Hans Nissen, Emil Schneider, Hans Meissner, Guenther Gibbe, Franz K. Ferenz, Hans W. Bjoernsen, Albert Robert Bertram, Emil Roedel, Paul F.L. Sievers indictment : conspiracy to violate Notification Act of 1917, and to defraud the United States of America, conspiracy to violate Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended and to defraud the United States of America (18 U.S.C. sec. 601, 22, U.S.C. sec. 611 to 616 : a true bill, Robert S. Carmichael, foreman, Charles M. Phillips, U.S. attorney : returned October 5, 1943.

In the District Court of the United States for the district of New Jersey, April term 1943, United States of America vs. Fritz Schroeder, German-American Vocational League, Inc., o...

Published 1943

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

In the matter of the application of Thomas K. Coyne, an honorably discharged World War veteran, petitioner-appellant for an order against William Wilson, commissioner of the department of housing and buildings of the city of New York, Joseph D. McGoldrick and Almerindo Portfolio, comptroller and treasurer, respectively, of the city of New York, defendants-respondents notice of motion to dismiss appeals for want of jurisdiction, with affidavit and supporting brief.

In the matter of the application of Thomas K. Coyne, an honorably discharged World War veteran, petitioner-appellant for an order against William Wilson, commissioner of the depart...

Published 1943

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

Goldstein, et al., defendant-appellant, v. United States, respondent brief for appellant.

Goldstein, et al., defendant-appellant, v. United States, respondent brief for appellant. by Goldstein, Maxmillan

Published 1941

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

Goldstein, et al., defendant-appellant, v. United States, respondent brief for respondent.

Goldstein, et al., defendant-appellant, v. United States, respondent brief for respondent.

Published 1941

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

In the matter of the investigation of chain broadcasting supplemental brief of National Broadcasting Company, Inc.

In the matter of the investigation of chain broadcasting supplemental brief of National Broadcasting Company, Inc.

Published 1941

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook

The American Brake Shoe and Foundry Company, plaintiff, against Interborough Rapid Transit Company, defendant, application 98 report of special master.

The American Brake Shoe and Foundry Company, plaintiff, against Interborough Rapid Transit Company, defendant, application 98 report of special master.

Published 1940

Full Text (via Gale)

Electronic eBook