Defamation and the right to freedom of speech : the UK in comparative perspective / Mariette Jones.

"In an effort to balance the protection of reputation and the right to free speech, the UK Parliament attempted to fundamentally transform English libel law through the Defamation Act 2013. This book evaluates the success of this attempt by means of a comparative analysis of relevant law in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via Taylor & Francis)
Main Author: Jones, Mariëtte (Author)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Abingdon, Oxon [U.K.] ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2024.
Series:Routledge research in human rights law.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 in00000219940
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 240510s2024 enk ob 001 0 eng d
005 20240708145422.0
020 |a 9781003416005  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 1003416004  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9781040045077  |q (electronic bk. : EPUB) 
020 |a 1040045073  |q (electronic bk. : EPUB) 
020 |a 9781040044957  |q (electronic bk. : PDF) 
020 |a 1040044956  |q (electronic bk. : PDF) 
020 |z 9781032520025 
020 |z 1032520027 
020 |z 9781032542638 
020 |z 1032542632 
024 7 |a 10.4324/9781003416005  |2 doi 
035 |a (OCoLC)tfe1433157237 
035 |a (OCoLC)1433157237 
037 |a tfe9781003416005 
040 |a TYFRS  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c TYFRS  |d TYFRS 
043 |a e-uk-en  |a e-uk-wl 
049 |a GWRE 
050 4 |a KD1960 
100 1 |a Jones, Mariëtte,  |e author.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2007134957  |1 http://isni.org/isni/0000000047665430 
245 1 0 |a Defamation and the right to freedom of speech :  |b the UK in comparative perspective /  |c Mariette Jones. 
264 1 |a Abingdon, Oxon [U.K.] ;  |a New York, NY :  |b Routledge,  |c 2024. 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Routledge research in human rights law 
545 0 |a Mariette Jones is Senior Lecturer in Law at Middlesex University, UK. 
520 |a "In an effort to balance the protection of reputation and the right to free speech, the UK Parliament attempted to fundamentally transform English libel law through the Defamation Act 2013. This book evaluates the success of this attempt by means of a comparative analysis of relevant law in the United States of America (US), Germany and the European Court of Human Rights. It examines the reasons why it was deemed necessary to reform the common law of defamation in England and Wales, the changes wrought by the act, and the case law it has engendered. As defamation often occurs internationally, the book also takes a broad comparative look at the way in which other relevant jurisdictions attempt to balance reputational protection and free speech. The natural starting point is the US where freedom of expression is strongly protected by the US Constitution. From there the focus shifts to Germany where both competing legal interests are likewise given constitutional protection. The European Court of Human Rights' jurisprudence is also examined because of its highly developed balancing approach and its general reflection of European legal thinking. Recent high-profile defamation cases such as those concerning the actors Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, decided in the UK as well as the US, form interesting and informative case studies. The final section of the work rates the libel reform attempted in the UK against its own benchmarks, provides suggestions about the way in which it is developing, and concludes that valuable lessons can still be learnt from the comparator jurisdictions. The book will be essential reading for those working in the areas of Human Rights Law and Media Law"--  |c Provided by publisher. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a Defamation and freedom of speech -- Common law of defamation in England and Wales prior to the Defamation Act 2013 -- Defamation law in England and Wales after the 2013 reforms -- Defamation in the United States of America -- Defamation in Germany -- Defamation in the European Court of Human Rights -- Analysis and conclusions. 
588 0 |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (Taylor & Francis, viewed May 15, 2024). 
610 1 0 |a Great Britain.  |t Defamation Act 2013.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2014026616 
650 0 |a Libel and slander  |z England. 
650 0 |a Libel and slander  |z Wales. 
650 0 |a Libel and slander  |z Germany. 
650 0 |a Libel and slander  |z United States.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008106933 
650 0 |a Freedom of speech.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85051707 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Jones, Mariëtte.  |t Defamation and the right to freedom of speech.  |d Abingdon, Oxon [UK] ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2024  |z 9781032520025  |w (DLC) 2024001179  |w (OCoLC)1415748152 
856 4 0 |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003416005  |z Full Text (via Taylor & Francis) 
830 0 |a Routledge research in human rights law.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2009171218 
915 |a - 
944 |a MARS - RDA ENRICHED 
956 |a Taylor & Francis Ebooks 
956 |b Taylor & Francis All eBooks 
994 |a 92  |b COD 
998 |b Added to collection informaworld.tandfebooks 
999 f f |s 65a17d7a-53be-438a-8024-66265106a8a1  |i 5d3ee333-cbab-4dbd-81ee-04356f575995 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e KD1960   |h Library of Congress classification  |i web