A case study in collaborative research : development of ́œconfirmation wars, legislative time, and collateral damagé / Anthony J. Madonna, James E. Monogan III, and Richard L. Vining Jr.

In our study of how U.S. Supreme Court nominations affect other parts of the president́s agenda, we had to work through the expectations and conventions of several different subfields in American politics. This became apparent during the review process when we had to respond to a wide array of comme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via SAGE)
Main Authors: Madonna, Anthony J. (Author), Monogan, James E., III (Author), Vining, Richard L., Jr (Author)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: London : SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019.
Series:SAGE Research Methods. Cases.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500
001 in00000109025
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 190103s2019 enk fob 000 0 eng d
005 20231207225216.0
035 |a (OCoLC)srm1084522873 
037 |a srm/collaborative-research-confirmation-wars-legislative-time-collateral-damage 
040 |a SGPBL  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c SGPBL  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCO 
020 |a 9781526466020  |q (ebook) 
020 |a 1526466023 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000067608864 
035 |a (OCoLC)1084522873 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF8776  |b .M33 2019 
049 |a GWRE 
100 1 |a Madonna, Anthony J.,  |e author. 
245 1 2 |a A case study in collaborative research :  |b development of ́œconfirmation wars, legislative time, and collateral damagé /  |c Anthony J. Madonna, James E. Monogan III, and Richard L. Vining Jr. 
264 1 |a London :  |b SAGE Publications Ltd,  |c 2019. 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a SAGE Research Methods. Cases 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
520 8 |a In our study of how U.S. Supreme Court nominations affect other parts of the president́s agenda, we had to work through the expectations and conventions of several different subfields in American politics. This became apparent during the review process when we had to respond to a wide array of comments. This case talks about some of the challenges associated with cross-subfield research. In addition, this study serves as a good example of event history analysis, a method useful for the study of how long it takes before a certain outcome occurs. In preparing the data for our model, we started with otherś replication data and extended it to fit the needs of our study. This case thereby focuses on addressing an array of concerns with doing cross-subfield research, using event history models, and using otherś data as a guide for new coding. 
588 |a Description based on XML content. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court  |v Case studies. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00529481 
650 0 |a Judges  |x Selection and appointment  |z United States  |v Case studies. 
650 0 |a Judicial power  |z United States  |v Case studies. 
650 0 |a Judges  |x Selection and appointment  |v Case studies. 
650 7 |a Judges  |x Selection and appointment.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00984544 
650 7 |a Judicial power.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00984696 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Case studies.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01423765 
700 1 |a Monogan, James E.,  |c III,  |e author. 
700 1 |a Vining, Richard L.,  |c Jr.,  |e author. 
830 0 |a SAGE Research Methods. Cases. 
856 4 0 |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://methods.sagepub.com/case/collaborative-research-confirmation-wars-legislative-time-collateral-damage  |z Full Text (via SAGE) 
915 |a M 
956 |a Sage Research Methods 
956 |b SAGE Research Methods Cases Part2 
998 |b New collection SAGE.casesrm2 
994 |a 92  |b COD 
999 f f |s b950af6a-8aff-4e6a-831c-d921c596eb97  |i df694ef7-33b3-4b2d-8ec3-4f39c80d1c5b 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e KF8776 .M33 2019  |h Library of Congress classification  |i web