Analyzing the 2016 Republican primary using a Tobit model / Michael Lee.
Sometimes political scientists analyze data where distinctions between data points are unobservable above or below a critical limit. In this case study, we will examine how to address the problems related to this kind of data (broadly known as censored data). The reader will be taken through an exam...
Saved in:
Online Access: |
Full Text (via SAGE) |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
London :
SAGE Publications Ltd,
2019.
|
Series: | SAGE Research Methods. Cases.
|
Subjects: |
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | in00000109024 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
008 | 190103s2019 enka fob 000 0 eng d | ||
005 | 20231207225216.1 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)srm1084517981 | ||
037 | |a srm/analyzing-the-2016-republican-primary-using-a-tobit-model | ||
040 | |a SGPBL |b eng |e rda |e pn |c SGPBL |d OCLCO |d OCLCF |d OCLCO | ||
020 | |a 9781526476869 |q (ebook) | ||
020 | |a 152647686X | ||
029 | 1 | |a AU@ |b 000065928723 | |
035 | |a (OCoLC)1084517981 | ||
043 | |a n-us--- | ||
050 | 4 | |a JK2071 |b .L44 2019 | |
049 | |a GWRE | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lee, Michael, |d active 2018, |e author. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Analyzing the 2016 Republican primary using a Tobit model / |c Michael Lee. |
264 | 1 | |a London : |b SAGE Publications Ltd, |c 2019. | |
300 | |a 1 online resource : |b illustrations. | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a SAGE Research Methods. Cases | |
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
520 | 8 | |a Sometimes political scientists analyze data where distinctions between data points are unobservable above or below a critical limit. In this case study, we will examine how to address the problems related to this kind of data (broadly known as censored data). The reader will be taken through an example of data that (sometimes) exhibit these featureśfeeling thermometers toward candidates in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Particular attention will be paid to the use of Tobit models as a potential solution to censored data. | |
588 | |a Description based on XML content. | ||
650 | 0 | |a Primaries |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Tobits. | |
650 | 0 | |a Regression analysis. | |
650 | 7 | |a Primaries. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01076313 | |
650 | 7 | |a Regression analysis. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01432090 | |
650 | 7 | |a Tobits. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01152027 | |
651 | 7 | |a United States. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 | |
830 | 0 | |a SAGE Research Methods. Cases. | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://methods.sagepub.com/case/analyzing-the-2016-republican-primary-using-a-tobit-model |z Full Text (via SAGE) |
915 | |a M | ||
956 | |a Sage Research Methods | ||
956 | |b SAGE Research Methods Cases Part2 | ||
998 | |b New collection SAGE.casesrm2 | ||
994 | |a 92 |b COD | ||
999 | f | f | |s d8235e91-62b9-4b5d-a78c-1f1ff0b8e79d |i a8af8e71-cd82-48f2-9625-1651a61ec5c8 |
952 | f | f | |p Can circulate |a University of Colorado Boulder |b Online |c Online |d Online |e JK2071 .L44 2019 |h Library of Congress classification |i web |