Measuring and Promoting Inter-Rater Agreement of Teacher and Principal Performance Ratings [electronic resource] / Matthew Graham, Anthony Milanowski and Jackson Miller.
As states, districts, and schools transition toward more rigorous educator evaluation systems, they are placing additional weight on judgments about educator practice. Since teacher and principal observation ratings inherently rely on evaluators' professional judgment, there is always a questio...
Saved in:
Online Access: |
Full Text (via ERIC) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Electronic eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
[S.l.] :
Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
2012.
|
Subjects: |
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a22000002u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | b7341160 | ||
003 | CoU | ||
005 | 20120703162551.5 | ||
006 | m d f | ||
007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
008 | 120201s2012 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d | ||
035 | |a (ERIC)ed532068 | ||
035 | |a (MvI) 3V000000514262 | ||
040 | |a ericd |c MvI |d MvI | ||
099 | |a ED532068 | ||
099 | |a ED532068 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Graham, Matthew. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Measuring and Promoting Inter-Rater Agreement of Teacher and Principal Performance Ratings |h [electronic resource] / |c Matthew Graham, Anthony Milanowski and Jackson Miller. |
260 | |a [S.l.] : |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, |c 2012. | ||
300 | |a 33 p. | ||
500 | |a Sponsoring Agency: Department of Education (ED). |5 ericd. | ||
500 | |a Abstractor: As Provided. |5 ericd. | ||
500 | |a Educational level discussed: Elementary Secondary Education. | ||
516 | |a Text (Reports, Descriptive) | ||
520 | |a As states, districts, and schools transition toward more rigorous educator evaluation systems, they are placing additional weight on judgments about educator practice. Since teacher and principal observation ratings inherently rely on evaluators' professional judgment, there is always a question of how much the ratings depend on the particular evaluator rather than the educator's actual performance. To help states, districts, and schools measure and maximize consistency of evaluator observation ratings, this paper: (1) draws a distinction between inter-rater reliability and interrater agreement, (2) reviews methods for calculating inter-rater reliability and agreement, (3) reviews thresholds for inter-rater agreement scores, and (4) identifies practices that can improve inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement. Two appendixes present: (1) More on Intra-Class Correlations; and (2) Frame-of-Reference Training Outline. (Contains 7 footnotes and 7 tables.) [This report was produced by the Center for Educator Compensation Reform (CECR).] | ||
524 | |a Online Submission. |2 ericd. | ||
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Interrater Reliability. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Evaluators. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Observation. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Principals. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Administrator Evaluation. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Teacher Evaluation. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Measurement. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Training. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Selection. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Accountability. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Scoring Rubrics. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Pilot Projects. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Video Technology. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Correlation. |2 ericd. |
700 | 1 | |a Milanowski, Anthony T., |e author. | |
700 | 1 | |a Miller, Jackson, |e author. | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532068.pdf |z Full Text (via ERIC) |
907 | |a .b73411607 |b 07-06-22 |c 04-02-13 | ||
998 | |a web |b 04-02-13 |c f |d m |e - |f eng |g xx |h 0 |i 1 | ||
956 | |a ERIC | ||
999 | f | f | |i 2adcf678-6dd9-52b9-a66a-56c133461dda |s 63295cce-458e-5d26-8745-f2afd4f51aab |
952 | f | f | |p Can circulate |a University of Colorado Boulder |b Online |c Online |d Online |e ED532068 |h Other scheme |i web |n 1 |