Report of the magnet length workshop [electronic resource]
A meeting was held at the Central Design Group (CDG), to discuss magnet length and to recommend a length for the planned Conceptual Design Report (CDR) as well as for magnet R and D. This report is a summary of the findings. Included is the letter from C. Taylor, CDG, convening the meeting, the prop...
Saved in:
Online Access: |
Online Access |
---|---|
Corporate Author: | |
Format: | Government Document Electronic eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Washington, D.C. : Oak Ridge, Tenn. :
United States. Dept. of Energy ; distributed by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Dept. of Energy,
1985.
|
Subjects: |
Summary: | A meeting was held at the Central Design Group (CDG), to discuss magnet length and to recommend a length for the planned Conceptual Design Report (CDR) as well as for magnet R and D. This report is a summary of the findings. Included is the letter from C. Taylor, CDG, convening the meeting, the proposed agenda, a summary of the results, and an appendix containing information presented at the meeting. The discussion mainly centered around 4, 5, and 6 dipoles per (100 m) half-cell. The magnetic lengths are approximately 16.6 m per dipole (the ROS length as well as that of the first R and D magnet now under construction), 20.75 m for four dipoles per half-cell, and 13.8 m for six dipoles per half-cell. Cost estimates are given. The apparent cost advantage of the longer units could be partially offset if the aperture can be adjusted to take advantage of a more uniform average magnetic field that could be realized by sorting. This sorting can be more effective with 20% more (shorter) magnets in the machine. |
---|---|
Item Description: | Published through the Information Bridge: DOE Scientific and Technical Information. 12/31/1985. "ssc-sr--1018" " conf-8510523--" "DE95011081" Magnet length workshop, Berkeley, CA (United States), 7-8 Oct 1985. Lawrence Berkeley Lab., CA (United States). SSC Central Design Group. |
Physical Description: | 64 p. : digital, PDF file. |