The Dangers of Fragmentation [electronic resource] / J. A. Bryant, Jr.

In this paper, it is argued that fragmentation inevitably occurs in a discipline whenever that discipline loses its distinctive center, and that the proper center for any program of literary study is an abiding concern with demonstrating and teaching the function of the symbolic imagination. The aut...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Bryant, J. A., Jr
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1974.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6529441
003 CoU
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 741101s1974 xx |||| o ||| s eng d
005 20230817230304.8
035 |a (ERIC)ed106868 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED106868 
100 1 |a Bryant, J. A.,  |c Jr. 
245 1 4 |a The Dangers of Fragmentation  |h [electronic resource] /  |c J. A. Bryant, Jr. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1974. 
300 |a 10 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED106868. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the South Atlantic Modern Language Association (44th, Washington, D. C., October 31-November 2, 1974).  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Higher Education. 
520 |a In this paper, it is argued that fragmentation inevitably occurs in a discipline whenever that discipline loses its distinctive center, and that the proper center for any program of literary study is an abiding concern with demonstrating and teaching the function of the symbolic imagination. The author suggests that any department of literature that fails to center its program on the teaching of literature as a special mode of knowledge quite distinct from the modes employed by the social and political sciences forfeits its right to be called a department of literature. Literature can be approached in the following three general ways: reading for pleasure, reading for substantial knowledge, and reading to understand the function of the symbolic imagination. Only the third way will keep the study of literature alive. (TS) 
650 1 7 |a Educational Objectives.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a English Curriculum.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Interdisciplinary Approach.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Literary Criticism.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Literature.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Literature Programs.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Objectives.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED106868.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b65294415  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-19-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 4  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 61b6d8a0-496f-5292-8c97-fccb362aebf0  |s 2a2bae2b-9422-567e-bee8-69b93adcc8ad 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED106868  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1