Determination. Working Papers on Language Universals, No. 1 [electronic resource] / Edith A. Moravcsik.
This paper argues that the hypothesis that all languages have a definitization process is empirically refutable, and that use of the terminology "definite" and "indefinite" is justified in that it reflects intuitions of grammarians and linguists. The following statements are test...
Saved in:
| Online Access: |
Full Text (via ERIC) |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Corporate Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[S.l.] :
Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
1969.
|
| Subjects: |
| Summary: | This paper argues that the hypothesis that all languages have a definitization process is empirically refutable, and that use of the terminology "definite" and "indefinite" is justified in that it reflects intuitions of grammarians and linguists. The following statements are tested against evidence from samples of different languages: (1) all noun phrases in a discourse may undergo definitization and turn out definite or indefinite; (2) all pronouns may similarly be marked for definitiveness; (3) at least some relative construction heads are definite; (4) numerated nouns, unless they have undergone the definitization, are indefinite. Following this, there is a discussion of the notion of "article" and how it may be described meaningfully. Appendices include tables of Indonesian articles in relation to pronouns, and of cross-linguistic distribution of some definitiveness markers. (Author/AM) |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | ERIC Document Number: ED105717. |
| Physical Description: | 39 p. |