Capturing Native Intuitions [electronic resource] : A Criticism of the Chomsky-Halle Auxiliary Reduction Rules / Alvin L. Gregg.

The justification for the Chomsky-Halle Auxiliary Reduction Rule III, called Pretonic Stress Placement (PSP), is questioned from the point of view of the native speaker. The similarity of the PSP and the Main Stress Rule (MSR) is examined through the application of these rules to polysyllabic monomo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Gregg, Alvin L.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1973.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6520752
003 CoU
005 20081118081343.3
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 730101s1973 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed096824 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED096824 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED096824 
100 1 |a Gregg, Alvin L. 
245 1 0 |a Capturing Native Intuitions  |h [electronic resource] :  |b A Criticism of the Chomsky-Halle Auxiliary Reduction Rules /  |c Alvin L. Gregg. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1973. 
300 |a 11 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED096824. 
520 |a The justification for the Chomsky-Halle Auxiliary Reduction Rule III, called Pretonic Stress Placement (PSP), is questioned from the point of view of the native speaker. The similarity of the PSP and the Main Stress Rule (MSR) is examined through the application of these rules to polysyllabic monomorphemic and polymorphemic words. This analysis is based on the hypothesis that the native speaker divides polysyllabic words considered by the linguist to be monomorphemic, such as "Monongahela" and "Oklahoma," into two morphic units. For these words the PSP is found to be a repetition of the MSR in that two cycles through the MSR achieve the results of the PSP without the addition of the latter rule. Indirect evidence for the native speaker's hypothesized morphic division is found in the morph reshaping processes of clipping and iconic reshaping of loanwords. The need for further attention to speakers' intuitions about lexical analysis is stressed. (KM) 
650 0 7 |a Deep Structure.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Generative Grammar.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Linguistic Competence.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Linguistic Theory.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Morphology (Languages)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Phonology.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Pronunciation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Structural Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Surface Structure.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Syntax.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Transformational Generative Grammar.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED096824.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b6520752x  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-22-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i c42d9a6d-e822-5aee-bdfa-3b89a7ac854c  |s 1bb1b270-49ca-5643-9d7d-5bae30c9d579 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED096824  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1