Keyes et al. v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colorado, et al. Supreme Court of the United States: Syllabus; Slip Opinion. Argued October 12, 1972 [electronic resource] : Decided June 21, 1973.

Petitioners sought desegregation of the Park Hill area schools in Denver, and, upon securing an order of the District Court directing that relief, expanded their suit to secure desegregation of the remaining schools of the Denver school district, particularly those in the core city area. The Distric...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Corporate Author: Supreme Court of the U. S., Washington, DC
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1973.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6505685
003 CoU
005 20081118081318.7
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 730621s1973 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed078112 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED078112 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED078112 
110 2 |a Supreme Court of the U. S., Washington, DC. 
245 1 0 |a Keyes et al. v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colorado, et al. Supreme Court of the United States: Syllabus; Slip Opinion. Argued October 12, 1972  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Decided June 21, 1973. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1973. 
300 |a 77 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED078112. 
520 |a Petitioners sought desegregation of the Park Hill area schools in Denver, and, upon securing an order of the District Court directing that relief, expanded their suit to secure desegregation of the remaining schools of the Denver school district, particularly those in the core city area. The District Court denied the further relief, holding that the deliberate racial segregation of the Park Hill Schools did not prove a like segregation policy addressed specifically to the core city schools and requiring petitioners to prove de jure segregation for each area that they sought to have desegregated. The court nevertheless found that the segregated core city schools were educationally inferior to "white" schools elsewhere in the district and ordered the respondents to provide substantially equal facilities for those schools. This latter relief was reversed by the Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court held that: (1) the District Court, for purposes of defining a "segregated" core city school, erred in not placing Negroes and Hispanos in the same category and (2) the courts below did not apply the correct legal standard in dealing with petitioners' contention that respondent School Board had the policy of deliberately segregating the core city schools. ["Elementary School Boundaries, September 1967," a map of School District No. 1, has been deleted from this document due to poor reproducibility.] (Author/JM) 
650 0 7 |a Civil Rights.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a De Facto Segregation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a De Jure Segregation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Desegregation Litigation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Educational Opportunities.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Equal Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Inner City.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Integration Studies.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Neighborhood Schools.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Racial Integration.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a School Desegregation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a School Policy.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a School Segregation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Supreme Court Litigation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Urban Schools.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a Supreme Court of the U. S., Washington, DC. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED078112.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b65056851  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-19-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 0e8fb19d-7301-5c94-a9ff-c6aef3af6f1e  |s 91ecc0a1-41f3-5712-b28d-00789b023eb2 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED078112  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1