Faculty Evaluation Workshop For Community College Deans of Instruction [electronic resource] / Florence B. Brawer and Leslie Purdy.

A workshop for community college deans of instruction focused on evaluating faculty in California community colleges. Eight major concerns of faculty regarding their evaluation were discussed with emphasis on the positive aspects of evaluation. The use of simulations provided workshop participants w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Brawer, Florence B.
Other Authors: Purdy, Leslie
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1972.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6495231
003 CoU
005 20090120104459.1
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 720601s1972 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed065119 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED065119 
100 1 |a Brawer, Florence B. 
245 1 0 |a Faculty Evaluation Workshop For Community College Deans of Instruction  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Florence B. Brawer and Leslie Purdy. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1972. 
300 |a 6 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED065119. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Report of a workshop coordinated by the ERIC Clearinghouse for Junior Colleges and held at the University of California, Los Angeles, June 27-28, 1972.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Higher Education. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Two Year Colleges. 
520 |a A workshop for community college deans of instruction focused on evaluating faculty in California community colleges. Eight major concerns of faculty regarding their evaluation were discussed with emphasis on the positive aspects of evaluation. The use of simulations provided workshop participants with the opportunity to assume roles of deans of instruction, colleagues, department chairmen, and candidates for faculty positions. Golden West College's (California) Assessment of Student Learning (ASL) system was presented as one model for faculty evaluation. The ASL system, which stresses faculty use of specific or behavioral objectives in course planning, was discussed in terms of its advantages to faculty members and the college. Conclusions of the workshop include: (1) an evaluation scheme should be based on definite performance criteria; (2) deans themselves should become aware of the use of objectives and faculty self-evaluation; (3) the problem of evaluating faculty who do not use objectives was not resolved by the participating deans; (4) the use of simulation appeared a successful way of bringing out problems and underlying concerns; and (5) the participants felt that the workshop was beneficial and should be followed-up with additional meetings. (RG) 
650 1 7 |a Academic Deans.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Administrator Role.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Behavioral Objectives.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Course Objectives.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Deans.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Evaluation Criteria.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Faculty Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Role Playing.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Self Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teacher Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Two Year Colleges.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Purdy, Leslie. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED065119.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64952319  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-12-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 304c9fcf-993a-5f8c-9061-a62754be9f8e  |s 8984d01e-08ab-510a-872a-588ecb69535c 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED065119  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1