Concerning Grading and Other Forms of Student Evaluation [electronic resource] / Wesley J. Dale.

There is increasing protest regarding the validity and usefulness of current methods of evaluating students' abilities and achievements. With higher education accessible to the masses, increased competition for college, graduate school, and good jobs has made the attainment of "good grades...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Dale, Wesley J.
Corporate Author: Council of Graduate Schools in the United States
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1969.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6472456
003 CoU
005 20080221101608.7
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 691205s1969 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed036260 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED036260 
100 1 |a Dale, Wesley J. 
245 1 0 |a Concerning Grading and Other Forms of Student Evaluation  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Wesley J. Dale. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1969. 
300 |a 6 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED036260. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Address to the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Council of Graduate Schools in the U.S., Washington D.C., Dec 4-6, 1969.  |5 ericd. 
520 |a There is increasing protest regarding the validity and usefulness of current methods of evaluating students' abilities and achievements. With higher education accessible to the masses, increased competition for college, graduate school, and good jobs has made the attainment of "good grades" more important than ever. Yet the appearance of objectivity and precise evaluation in grades really conceals a host of assumptions and undefined variables. Many alternatives have been proposed: pass/fail, satisfactory/unsatisfactory, etc. The traditional system of grading has many advantages, however; it has been tested by experience and the grade point average is one of the most consistent indicators of a student's probable success. Although the traditional system is objectionable, there is no one panacea. It is important that the teacher/grader be aware of the capabilities and limitations of alternate grading methods, and be willing to experiment with a mix of alternatives, including more individual counseling and personalized diagnostic evaluation. The re-evaluation of the grading system should be extended to a complete re-evaluation of the mission and regulations of graduate degree programs. (AF) 
650 0 7 |a Academic Achievement.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Achievement Rating.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Grades (Scholastic)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Grading.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Graduate Study.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Pass Fail Grading.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Student Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a Council of Graduate Schools in the United States. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED036260.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64724566  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-12-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i c75e516e-8da2-526d-9f97-81cc232827a5  |s ae8591ea-d5b1-5b51-9dc8-b3abe6b7a86f 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED036260  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1