Evaluation of the Communication Skills Centers Project [electronic resource]

A reading program was established to provide remedial reading therapy for disadvantaged students and inservice training in diagnostic and remedial techniques for their regular classroom teachers. Reading achievement gains exhibited as a result of the program were measured according to pre- and postt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Corporate Author: Detroit Public Schools
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1968.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6461382
003 CoU
005 20090120104432.1
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 680101s1968 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed021911 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED021911 
110 2 |a Detroit Public Schools. 
245 1 0 |a Evaluation of the Communication Skills Centers Project  |h [electronic resource] 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1968. 
300 |a 40 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED021911. 
520 |a A reading program was established to provide remedial reading therapy for disadvantaged students and inservice training in diagnostic and remedial techniques for their regular classroom teachers. Reading achievement gains exhibited as a result of the program were measured according to pre- and posttest scores on standardized reading achievement tests. Improvement in students' school-related attitudes and classroom learning, and the value of the inservice workshop program were measured by questionnaires administered to workshop participants. It was found that program participants in grades three through six gained in reading comprehension achievement at a normal rate, which was significantly greater than would be expected for normal-achieving students and over twice as great as would be expected without the intervention of reading therapy. Of 144 randomly selected pupil participants, 50 percent showed improved attitudes towards school and 56 percent improved the quality of their schoolwork. Most of the 596 teachers who attended the inservice workshop reported that the training was valuable and practical. It was suggested, however, that there be closer communication between program personnel and teacher participants and more feedback of diagnostic information to students' regular classroom teachers. (LB) 
650 1 7 |a Achievement Gains.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Behavior Change.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Data.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Disadvantaged Youth.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Inservice Teacher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Private Schools.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Public Schools.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Questionnaires.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Reading Achievement.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Centers.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Tests.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Remedial Programs.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Remedial Reading.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Student Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Tables (Data)  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED021911.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64613823  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-11-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 7d85291c-6507-5bbc-9c12-0fd34367c8f9  |s a56b9cf2-b1e1-5950-b24f-4c7744b5e791 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED021911  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1