Teaching Business Communications by the Traditional Writing and the Word Processing Methods [electronic resource] : A Comparison / Mary Giovannini.

Seventy students in a college business communications course participated in a study to determine whether there were significant differences in students' attitudes toward the course when the traditional writing method or the word processing method was used. The study also sought to ascertain wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Giovannini, Mary
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1982.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6444561
003 CoU
005 20080306155041.6
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 820401s1982 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed216370 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED216370 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED216370 
100 1 |a Giovannini, Mary. 
245 1 0 |a Teaching Business Communications by the Traditional Writing and the Word Processing Methods  |h [electronic resource] :  |b A Comparison /  |c Mary Giovannini. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1982. 
300 |a 14 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED216370. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Midwest Regional Meeting of the American Business Communication Association (Indianapolis, IN, April 23-24, 1982).  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Higher Education. 
520 |a Seventy students in a college business communications course participated in a study to determine whether there were significant differences in students' attitudes toward the course when the traditional writing method or the word processing method was used. The study also sought to ascertain whether the traditional writing method developed a higher level of cognitive achievement in business communications than the word processing method. The sample was divided into two sections, with the traditional writing group completing the assignments by hand or typing, and the word processing group completing their assignments by dictating at a word processing center. Both groups were given the same letter writing test problems. Student attitudes toward the subject were surveyed in a pretest and a posttest, and cognitive achievement was measured by the combined mean scores of the letter writing test problems and by an objective posttest. No statistical differences between the groups were revealed by the attitude surveys or the objective posttest of cognitive achievement. However, analysis of the mean scores from the letter writing test problems indicated that the word processing group showed better skills in letter writing. (HTH) 
650 0 7 |a Business Communication.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Business Correspondence.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Business Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a College Students.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Comparative Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Handwriting.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Student Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teaching Methods.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Word Processing.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED216370.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64445616  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-18-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 52db0a64-0b94-5e16-ba50-5a5f77ddc763  |s 604144ab-d32e-5728-83cf-258488a482c2 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED216370  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1