Social Generalizations [electronic resource] : Biases and Solutions / R. Alan Hedley.

The author conducted a cross national analysis of sociological research reported in leading journals at two points in time over a ten year period to determine if sociologists' ability to produce valid social generalizations had improved significantly over the recent past. The official journals...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Hedley, R. Alan
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1981.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6441483
003 CoU
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 810801s1981 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
005 20230818004015.5
035 |a (ERIC)ed209156 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED209156 
100 1 |a Hedley, R. Alan. 
245 1 0 |a Social Generalizations  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Biases and Solutions /  |c R. Alan Hedley. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1981. 
300 |a 33 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED209156. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association (Toronto, Ontario, Canada, August, 1981).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a The author conducted a cross national analysis of sociological research reported in leading journals at two points in time over a ten year period to determine if sociologists' ability to produce valid social generalizations had improved significantly over the recent past. The official journals of the United States (American Sociological Review), Canada (Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology), and Great Britain (Sociology) were selected for examination. Also included in the analysis were two other highly reputed journals--the American Journal of Sociology and the British Journal of Sociology. Only articles reporting the results of empirical research were included in the comparative analysis. All of the research reports contained in the five journals were examined to determine the research design employed, the type of sample or population investigated, and the method used to collect the data. Results include the following. Particularly in the American journals, but also in the Canadian Review, the analysis revealed changes over the past ten years in the methodological characteristics of published studies such that sociologists' ability to make valid social generalizations may be improved substantially. By taking readings at several points in time, selecting a broadly based sample, and not relying exclusively upon one or two methods of data collection, it is extremely likely that the generalizations produced are less affected by measurement artifacts and instead reflect effects of relevant factors as they impinge upon the variables sociologists seek to explain. (Author/RM) 
650 0 7 |a Comparative Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Error of Measurement.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Generalization.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reliability.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Research Design.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Research Methodology.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Sampling.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Scholarly Journals.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Social Science Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Sociology.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Validity.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED209156.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64414838  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-18-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 32d74a98-3cc0-5227-9229-b08290c991cc  |s 65927c9f-1cf9-5086-8b91-27b53608999f 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED209156  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1