Arkansas Teacher Testing [electronic resource] : A Penny for Your Scores / Robert L. Kennedy.

Teacher testing began in Arkansas when the governor threatened to veto a 1% sales tax if a teacher testing bill were not passed. With enactment of Act 76 in 1983, an instrument was developed for field testing in 1984 over objections of the Arkansas Education Association. The test, the Arkansas Educa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Kennedy, Robert L.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1987.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6336515
003 CoU
005 20080221101519.9
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 871016s1987 xx |||| o ||| s eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed291790 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED291790 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED291790 
100 1 |a Kennedy, Robert L. 
245 1 0 |a Arkansas Teacher Testing  |h [electronic resource] :  |b A Penny for Your Scores /  |c Robert L. Kennedy. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1987. 
300 |a 18 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED291790. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association (Boston, MA, October 14-17, 1987).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a Teacher testing began in Arkansas when the governor threatened to veto a 1% sales tax if a teacher testing bill were not passed. With enactment of Act 76 in 1983, an instrument was developed for field testing in 1984 over objections of the Arkansas Education Association. The test, the Arkansas Educational Skills Assessment, is comprised of 50 multiple-choice reading questions, 50 mathematics questions, and a 200-word writing sample. Many legislators attempted to modify or eliminate the Act but the governor strongly supported it. Disagreements over cutoff scores, test bias, confidentiality of results, and testing procedures marked the period prior to the test date, March 23, 1985. Problems, including mixed-up scores and content leaks, were associated with subsequent test occasions in 1987. Finally, 3.6% of the teachers were never able to pass the test. In spite of the comedy-of-errors aspects of the test controversy, public support for teacher testing seems to indicate that the education profession needs to confront its own problems and to take steps to ensure the competency of those who enter its ranks. (SLD) 
650 0 7 |a Educational Legislation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Elementary Secondary Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Minimum Competency Testing.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a State Legislation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Teacher Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Teacher Certification.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teacher Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Teacher Militancy.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Teaching Skills.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Test Bias.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Testing Problems.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED291790.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b63365157  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-13-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-24-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 96eaf0a0-7389-51c6-b5c6-18d07eb5d1fd  |s 102dcf45-992b-5292-a68e-8130954d8f8e 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED291790  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1