Measurement Issues in Student Evaluations of Instruction and Their Impact on Decision Making [electronic resource] / Thomas R. Cochran and Archer Gravely.

Methods were examined by which the results of student evaluations of instruction may be presented as one indicator of teaching effectiveness for faculty personnel committees in order to best answer the question of teaching competence. Specifically, the study examined two measures of central tendency...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Cochran, Thomas R.
Other Authors: Gravely, Archer
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1987.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6335779
003 CoU
005 20100505133733.9
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 871030s1987 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed290395 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED290395 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED290395 
100 1 |a Cochran, Thomas R. 
245 1 0 |a Measurement Issues in Student Evaluations of Instruction and Their Impact on Decision Making  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Thomas R. Cochran and Archer Gravely. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1987. 
300 |a 19 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED290395. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Southern Association for Institutional Research and the Society for College and University Planning (New Orleans, LA, October 28-30, 1987).  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Higher Education. 
520 |a Methods were examined by which the results of student evaluations of instruction may be presented as one indicator of teaching effectiveness for faculty personnel committees in order to best answer the question of teaching competence. Specifically, the study examined two measures of central tendency, the median and the mean, to determine which method best addressed the question of competence versus incompetence, rather than the teaching style used. The data utilized were the student evaluations of instruction for the 1986-87 year at the University of North Carolina at Asheville. The evaluation data for each class were merged with the personnel system to capture faculty demographics. A total of 210 faculty were included. The results indicated that the median better addresses the questions of competence than does the mean, given the limitations of ordinal data combined with the highly negatively skewed distribution. Those faculty rated between 3.5 and 4.0 on a five-point scale often are subject to unwarranted scrutiny by personnel committees concerning their competence. If the median were used, those questions would not occur. Recommendations are made regarding (1) feedback procedures by department chairs and deans; (2) peer review systems; (3) collection of data on valued teaching activities; and (4) personnel procedures that weight teaching, research, and service. (KM) 
650 1 7 |a College Faculty.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Decision Making.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Faculty Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Rating Scales.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Semantic Differential.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Statistical Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Teacher Effectiveness.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Gravely, Archer. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED290395.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b63357793  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-13-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-24-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i ba15ab2c-5e75-5e42-8aa2-e907c70ed059  |s 7ecf1395-7f7d-549b-9444-07d2390b56b9 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED290395  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1