Writing as a Linguistic Problem [electronic resource] / Deborah McCutchen.

The current focus on high level planning and abstract goals runs the risk of misrepresenting the contributions that cognitive psychology could make to the study of writing if it neglects important linguistic features that distinguish the writing of natural language from other problem solving tasks....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: McCutchen, Deborah (Deborah E.)
Corporate Author: University of Pittsburgh. Learning Research and Development Center
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1984.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6321458
003 CoU
005 20080221101703.3
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 840101s1984 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed258204 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
088 |a LRDC-1984/44 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED258204 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED258204 
100 1 |a McCutchen, Deborah  |q (Deborah E.) 
245 1 0 |a Writing as a Linguistic Problem  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Deborah McCutchen. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1984. 
300 |a 17 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED258204. 
500 |a Sponsoring Agency: National Inst. of Education (ED), Washington, DC.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Reprint from "Educational Psychology," Volume 19, Number 4, p226-238, 1984.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Also distributed on microfiche by U.S. GPO under ED 1.310/2:258204. 
520 |a The current focus on high level planning and abstract goals runs the risk of misrepresenting the contributions that cognitive psychology could make to the study of writing if it neglects important linguistic features that distinguish the writing of natural language from other problem solving tasks. An alternative perspective on writing emphasizes psycholinguistic processes involved in generating sentences and linking them into coherent text. The problem solving models of writing, developed out of work in cognitive science, are hierarchical in nature. While some hierarchical planning is done in writing (such as working from an outline), writers commonly begin with something and follow it to a preplanned next idea, or to a newly discovered thought or to a dead end. Words already written can drastically affect what follows them. Then, the interaction between the text-level processes and the planning-level processes can be seen. Understanding the linguistic text features, such as the "top down" approach to reading (an emphasis on the reader's knowledge and its schematic organization) and the "bottom up" approach (an emphasis on lower level linguistic processes) is important to the writer's effectiveness in communicating ideas to the reader and in solving writing problems. (EL) 
650 1 7 |a Cognitive Processes.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Language Skills.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Language Usage.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Linguistics.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Problem Solving.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Writing (Composition)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Writing Processes.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Writing Skills.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a University of Pittsburgh.  |b Learning Research and Development Center. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED258204.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b63214581  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-13-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 0f6666b0-710f-52c3-a0e1-3b5586291524  |s 893a16f2-9459-54ff-a375-501e9edde36e 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED258204  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1