Process-Oriented Writing Instruction in a Case-Method Class [electronic resource] / Barbara Fassler Walvoord and Daniel Singer.

To determine whether a teacher's guidance of the writing process in the classroom can produce measurable improvement in students' writing and learning over the course of a semester, an instructor of a college business management course taught three sections of the same course, using the sa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Walvoord, Barbara Fassler
Other Authors: Singer, Daniel
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1984.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6317805
003 CoU
005 20080221101451.6
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 840815s1984 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed249500 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED249500 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED249500 
100 1 |a Walvoord, Barbara Fassler. 
245 1 0 |a Process-Oriented Writing Instruction in a Case-Method Class  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Barbara Fassler Walvoord and Daniel Singer. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1984. 
300 |a 16 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED249500. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Management Association (Boston, MA, August 15, 1984).  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Higher Education. 
520 |a To determine whether a teacher's guidance of the writing process in the classroom can produce measurable improvement in students' writing and learning over the course of a semester, an instructor of a college business management course taught three sections of the same course, using the same texts and making the same assignments (six written case analyses), but approaching the writing process differently in each of the three sections. Section A was taught in the traditional way with an emphasis on lectures about business policy. Written case analyses were assigned with the assumption that students knew how to write, and that the instructor's job was to deal effectively with course content. In Section B, writing assignments were given in a manner designed to make the writing process more effective. Class discussion was frequently directed toward the nature of the writing process, and students were encouraged to use writing as a technique for developing thought. Section C was taught like Section B, except that students were also required to submit a draft of each written case analysis to an outside reader for review and then to revise the draft for final submission. The results suggest that the draft intervention and response technique used in Section C had a significant positive impact on students' rhetorical and analytical skills. A surprising result was the failure of the emphasis on writing in the lecture format to have a positive impact on either student performance or student improvement. (HOD) 
650 0 7 |a Business Administration.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Case Method (Teaching Technique)  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Comparative Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Content Area Writing.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Revision (Written Composition)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teaching Methods.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Writing (Composition)  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Writing Improvement.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Writing Instruction.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Writing Processes.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Writing Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Writing Skills.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Singer, Daniel. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED249500.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b63178059  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-13-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 2e34d4b5-5a67-5699-91f1-e82fddc2010a  |s 5a81627a-66cd-5fe5-bee2-f22465a6a136 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED249500  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1