A Judicial Paradigm for the Evaluation of Debates

A Judicial Paradigm for the Evaluation of Debates [microform] / Walter Ulrich.

Because legal argument shares many of the characteristics of academic debate, it can serve as a paradigm for evaluating debates. Like debate, legal argument is bilateral, the judge is external to the deliberation and excluded from raising his or her own arguments, and reasons have been developed for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: Ulrich, Walter
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1982.
Subjects:
Competition.
Court Litigation.
Court Role.
Debate.
Decision Making.
Evaluation Criteria.
Higher Education.
Judges.
Models.
Persuasive Discourse.

Internet

Request ERIC Document

PASCAL Offsite

Holdings details from PASCAL Offsite
Call Number: ED220895
ED220895 Available Place a Hold

Similar Items