Cross Examination Debate Association National Tournament Booklet of Judges, 1987 [microform] / Walter Ulrich, Ed.
The judging philosophy statements of most of the judges at the 1987 National Cross Examination Debate Association Tournament are contained in this booklet. A short form on each judge details how long they have been judging and how many rounds of debate on the topic of the tournament they had previou...
Saved in:
| Online Access: |
Request ERIC Document |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Microfilm Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[S.l.] :
Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
1987.
|
| Subjects: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000002u 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | b6207010 | ||
| 003 | CoU | ||
| 007 | he u||024|||| | ||
| 008 | 870401s1987 xx |||| b ||| | eng d | ||
| 005 | 20240722191531.3 | ||
| 035 | |a (ERIC)ed281254 | ||
| 040 | |a ericd |c ericd |d MvI | ||
| 099 | |f ERIC DOC # |a ED281254 | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Cross Examination Debate Association National Tournament Booklet of Judges, 1987 |h [microform] / |c Walter Ulrich, Ed. |
| 260 | |a [S.l.] : |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, |c 1987. | ||
| 300 | |a 128 p. | ||
| 336 | |a text |2 rdacontent. | ||
| 337 | |a microform |2 rdamedia. | ||
| 338 | |a microfiche |2 rdacarrier. | ||
| 500 | |a ERIC Note: Statements of judges at the Annual National Cross Examination Debate Association Tournament (Baton Rouge, LA, April 4-6, 1987). Several pages may not reproduce well because of print size. For a related document, see CS 505 583. |5 ericd. | ||
| 500 | |a ERIC Document Number: ED281254. | ||
| 520 | |a The judging philosophy statements of most of the judges at the 1987 National Cross Examination Debate Association Tournament are contained in this booklet. A short form on each judge details how long they have been judging and how many rounds of debate on the topic of the tournament they had previously judged. A longer form asks for information about their judging paradigms, their views on presentation of arguments by the affirmative and negative teams, and the roles of evidence, style, and delivery in their judging decisions. Samples of both forms are included. A list of all judges participating in the tournament is also included, and those judges for whom no judging philosophy statement could be located are indicated. The judging philosophies are presented alphabetically, and each judge addresses at least a subset of the questions on the forms. However, a few of the statements were prepared for other tournaments, and are more general. (SKC) | ||
| 533 | |a Microfiche. |b [Washington D.C.]: |c ERIC Clearinghouse |e microfiches : positive. | ||
| 583 | 1 | |a committed to retain |c 20240101 |d 20490101 |5 CoU |f Alliance Shared Trust |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies | |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Debate. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Evaluation Criteria. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Higher Education. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Judges. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Persuasive Discourse. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Philosophy. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Speech Communication. |2 ericd. |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ulrich, Walter. | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |z Request ERIC Document |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 |
| 907 | |a .b62070101 |b 01-18-22 |c 10-10-10 | ||
| 998 | |a pas |b 10-10-10 |c f |d m |e - |f eng |g xx |h 0 |i 1 | ||
| 956 | |a ERIC | ||
| 999 | f | f | |i d31a4701-72a9-5c71-b927-a27749f44689 |s bab481a3-dc75-52d3-a524-128171c3a70a |
| 952 | f | f | |p Can circulate |a University of Colorado Boulder |b Boulder Campus |c Offsite |d PASCAL Offsite |e ED281254 |h Other scheme |i microfiche |n 1 |