Evaluation as a Process [microform] : The Formative-Summative Continuum / Sharon L. Caudle.

Rather than automatically presuming explicit conditions exist when designing an evaluation to fit the summative or formative mold, evaluators should think of an evaluation design as fitting between endpoints on an evaluation process continuum. Evaluators can blend techniques from both the formative...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: Caudle, Sharon L.
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1985.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6199176
003 CoU
005 20080220150813.3
007 he u||024||||
008 851001s1985 xx |||| b ||| s eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed267085 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED267085 
100 1 |a Caudle, Sharon L. 
245 1 0 |a Evaluation as a Process  |h [microform] :  |b The Formative-Summative Continuum /  |c Sharon L. Caudle. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1985. 
300 |a 22 p. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Canadian Evaluation Society, Evaluation Network, and Evaluation Research Society (Toronto, Canada, October 17-19, 1985).  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED267085. 
520 |a Rather than automatically presuming explicit conditions exist when designing an evaluation to fit the summative or formative mold, evaluators should think of an evaluation design as fitting between endpoints on an evaluation process continuum. Evaluators can blend techniques from both the formative and summative evaluation, matching actual program conditions, "sliding" along the continuum to meet a primarily formative or summative goal. Using a case study, this paper explores ways in which formative and summative techniques can serve such complementary roles in a single evaluation process. The evaluation of the National Commodity Processing System, a pilot program to reduce government food surplus stocks, illustrates how decision rules arising from presumed, but untested, summative conditions unnecessarily narrowed the research scope and the final product given to decision makers. This left little room for the depth and detail that qualitative data could offer. The continuum evaluation took a much broader approach to fit differing needs. Concepts, definitions, and models should not be ordered in advance, but selected to give balance to achieve the purpose at hand. Evaluating from the standpoint of a constantly creative continuum is one alternative approach to achieve that balance. (PN) 
521 8 |a Researchers.  |b ericd. 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
650 0 7 |a Case Studies.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Evaluation Criteria.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Evaluation Methods.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Evaluation Needs.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Evaluation Problems.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Federal Programs.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Formative Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Program Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Research Methodology.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Research Needs.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Summative Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b61991764  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-10-10 
998 |a pas  |b 10-10-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 79013281-fbe8-562c-a66f-baa8b8f73e45  |s d3e3f2ae-0555-5c5f-a408-dc10b2bb0b99 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED267085  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1