Can Nonexperimental Comparison Group Methods Match the Findings from a Random Assignment Evaluation of Mandatory Welfare-to-Work Programs? MDRC Working Papers on Research Methodology /

Can Nonexperimental Comparison Group Methods Match the Findings from a Random Assignment Evaluation of Mandatory Welfare-to-Work Programs? [electronic resource] : MDRC Working Papers on Research Methodology / Howard S. Bloom, Charles Michalopoulos and Carolyn J. Hill.

A study explored which nonexperimental comparison group methods provide the most accurate estimates of the impacts of mandatory welfare-to-work programs and whether the best methods work well enough to substitute for random assignment experiments. Findings were compared for nonexperimental compariso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Bloom, Howard S.
Corporate Author: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation
Other Authors: Michalopoulos, Charles, Hill, Carolyn J., Lei, Ying
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 2002.
Subjects:
Adult Education.
Comparative Analysis.
Control Groups.
Error of Measurement.
Estimation (Mathematics)
Experimental Groups.
Groups.
Least Squares Statistics.
Program Evaluation.
Regression (Statistics)
Research Design.
Research Methodology.
Sampling.
Statistical Analysis.
Statistical Studies.
Welfare Recipients.
Welfare Reform.
Welfare Services.

Internet

Full Text (via ERIC)

Online

Holdings details from Online
Call Number: ED471814
ED471814 Available

Similar Items