Subgroup Achievement and Gap Trends [electronic resource] : Oregon.
This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and...
Saved in:
Online Access: |
Full Text (via ERIC) |
---|---|
Corporate Author: | |
Format: | Electronic eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
2009.
|
Subjects: |
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a22000002u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | b6103068 | ||
003 | CoU | ||
005 | 20100308111710.4 | ||
006 | m d f | ||
007 | cr un | ||
008 | 091001s2009 xx |||| os ||| | eng d | ||
035 | |a (ERIC)ed507955 | ||
040 | |a ericd |c ericd |d MvI | ||
099 | |a ED507955 | ||
110 | 2 | |a Center on Education Policy (Washington, D.C.) |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n98003361. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Subgroup Achievement and Gap Trends |h [electronic resource] : |b Oregon. |
260 | |a [Place of publication not identified] : |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, |c 2009. | ||
300 | |a 18 pages. | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent. | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia. | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier. | ||
500 | |a Availability: Center on Education Policy. 1001 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 522, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 202-822-8065; Fax: 202-822-6008; e-mail: cep-dc@cep-dc.org; Web site: http://www.cep-dc.org. |5 ericd. | ||
500 | |a Abstractor: ERIC. |5 ericd. | ||
500 | |a Educational level discussed: Elementary Education. | ||
500 | |a Educational level discussed: Elementary Secondary Education. | ||
500 | |a Educational level discussed: Grade 10. | ||
500 | |a Educational level discussed: Grade 4. | ||
500 | |a Educational level discussed: Grade 8. | ||
500 | |a Educational level discussed: High Schools. | ||
500 | |a Educational level discussed: Secondary Education. | ||
516 | |a Numeric (Numerical/Quantitative Data) | ||
516 | |a Text (Reports, Evaluative) | ||
520 | |a This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps between these groups at the proficient level across three grades (grade 4, grade 8 in most cases, and a high school grade). These two types of analyses show whether elementary school achievement has generally gone up for different groups of students and whether achievement gaps at different grade levels have narrowed, widened, or stayed the same. This paper profiles the student subgroup achievement and gap trends in Oregon. Because Oregon changed its test, too few years of data were available to determine trends at three achievement levels, including gap trends in terms of the percentage of students scoring proficient. Gaps in average test scores narrowed more often than they widened for all major student groups, but with clear differences by grade level--gaps narrowed for nearly all subgroups in middle and high school but widened for all in elementary school. (Contains 9 tables.) [For the main report, "State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 3: Are Achievement Gaps Closing and Is Achievement Rising for All?", see ED507909.] | ||
524 | |a Center on Education Policy. |2 ericd. | ||
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Federal Legislation. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Low Income. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a American Indians. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a African American Students. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Asian American Students. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Hispanic American Students. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a White Students. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Grade 8. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Grade 4. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Grade 10. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a English (Second Language) |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Disabilities. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gender Differences. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Academic Achievement. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Achievement Gap. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Achievement Gains. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a High Achievement. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Low Achievement. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Achievement Rating. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Student Evaluation. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Educational Assessment. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Reading Achievement. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Mathematics Achievement. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Evaluation Methods. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Outcomes of Education. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Educational Indicators. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Federal Programs. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Scores. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Achievement Tests. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Educational Testing. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Educational Trends. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Trend Analysis. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Accountability. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Educational Policy. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Educational Improvement. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Program Evaluation. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Program Effectiveness. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a State Programs. |2 ericd. |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a School Effectiveness. |2 ericd. |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED507955.pdf |z Full Text (via ERIC) |
907 | |a .b61030685 |b 07-05-22 |c 10-08-10 | ||
998 | |a web |b 10-08-10 |c b |d m |e - |f eng |g xx |h 0 |i 1 | ||
907 | |a .b61030685 |b 08-15-19 |c 10-08-10 | ||
944 | |a MARS - RDA ENRICHED | ||
907 | |a .b61030685 |b 07-30-19 |c 10-08-10 | ||
956 | |a ERIC | ||
948 | |a bslw19/20 : jul : ess | ||
999 | f | f | |i c19f4b24-1ae4-5d8c-ab3b-abf59c4da46c |s 268a8c6f-6c1a-533e-b612-e4954a2cf96f |
952 | f | f | |p Can circulate |a University of Colorado Boulder |b Online |c Online |d Online |e ED507955 |h Other scheme |i web |n 1 |