Development of an advanced, continuous mild gasification process for the production of co-products. Task 4.6, Economic evaluation [electronic resource]

The principal finding of this study was the high capital cost and poor financial performance predicted for the size and configuration of the plant design presented. The XBi financial assessment gave a disappointingly low base-case discounted cash flow rate of return (DCFRR) of only 8.1% based on a u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Online Access
Corporate Authors: University of North Dakota. Energy and Environmental Research Center (Researcher), National Energy Technology Laboratory (U.S.) (Researcher)
Format: Government Document Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C. : Oak Ridge, Tenn. : United States. Dept. of Energy ; distributed by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Dept. of Energy, 1992.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000003u 4500
001 b5974131
003 CoU
005 20080618000000.0
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 100524e19921001dcu st f0|||||eng|d
035 |a (TOE)ost10150911 
035 |a (TOE)10150911 
040 |a TOE  |c TOE 
049 |a GDWR 
072 7 |a 01  |2 edbsc 
086 0 |a E 1.99:doe/mc/24267--3329 
086 0 |a E 1.99:doe/mc/24267--3329 
245 0 0 |a Development of an advanced, continuous mild gasification process for the production of co-products. Task 4.6, Economic evaluation  |h [electronic resource] 
260 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b United States. Dept. of Energy ;  |a Oak Ridge, Tenn. :  |b distributed by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Dept. of Energy,  |c 1992. 
300 |a 187 p. :  |b digital, PDF file. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a Published through the Information Bridge: DOE Scientific and Technical Information. 
500 |a 10/01/1992. 
500 |a "doe/mc/24267--3329" 
500 |a "DE93000266" 
500 |a Cohen, L.R.; Ness, R.O. Jr.; Runge, B.D.; Sinor, J.E.; Hogsett, R.F. 
513 |a Topical;  |b 10/01/1992. 
520 3 |a The principal finding of this study was the high capital cost and poor financial performance predicted for the size and configuration of the plant design presented. The XBi financial assessment gave a disappointingly low base-case discounted cash flow rate of return (DCFRR) of only 8.1% based on a unit capital cost of $900 per ton year (tpy) for their 129,000 tpy design. This plant cost is in reasonable agreement with the preliminary estimates developed by J.E. Sinor Associates for a 117,000 tpy plant based on the FMC process with similar auxiliaries (Sinor, 1989), for which a unit capital costs of $938 tpy was predicted for a design that included char beneficiation and coal liquids upgrading--or about $779 tpy without the liquid upgrading facilities. The XBi assessment points out that a unit plant cost of $900 tpy is about three times the cost for a conventional coke oven, and therefore, outside the competitive range for commercialization. Modifications to improve process economics could involve increasing plant size, expanding the product slate that XBi has restricted to form coke and electricity, and simplifying the plant flow sheet by eliminating marginally effective cleaning steps and changing other key design parameters. Improving the financial performance of the proposed formed coke design to the level of a 20% DCFRR based on increased plant size alone would require a twenty-fold increase to a coal input of 20,000 tpd and a coke production of about 2.6 minion tpy--a scaling exponent of 0.70 to correct plant cost in relation to plant size. 
536 |b AC21-87MC24267. 
650 7 |a Coke.  |2 local. 
650 7 |a Design.  |2 local. 
650 7 |a Chars.  |2 local. 
650 7 |a Modifications.  |2 local. 
650 7 |a Economic Analysis.  |2 local. 
650 7 |a Coal Gasification.  |2 local. 
650 7 |a Scaling Laws.  |2 local. 
650 7 |a Formed Coke Processes.  |2 local. 
650 7 |a Size.  |2 local. 
650 7 |a Coal Liquids.  |2 local. 
650 7 |a Coal Gasification Plants.  |2 local. 
650 7 |a Coal, Lignite, And Peat.  |2 edbsc. 
710 2 |a University of North Dakota.  |b Energy and Environmental Research Center.  |4 res. 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Department of Energy.  |4 spn. 
710 2 |a National Energy Technology Laboratory (U.S.).  |4 res. 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Department of Energy.  |b Office of Scientific and Technical Information.  |4 dst. 
856 4 0 |u http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/10150911-WI4iLI/  |z Online Access 
907 |a .b59741314  |b 03-06-23  |c 05-26-10 
998 |a web  |b 05-26-10  |c f  |d m   |e p  |f eng  |g dcu  |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a Information bridge 
999 f f |i c0a2a124-4a71-5007-aa0c-16d8203c4647  |s f460eb1d-2333-5004-9ddc-ac0729bd0aa9 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e E 1.99:doe/mc/24267--3329  |h Superintendent of Documents classification  |i web  |n 1