Wabash River Coal Gasification Combined Cycle Repowering Project [electronic resource] : Clean Coal Technology Program. Environmental Assessment.
The proposed project would result in a combined-cycle power plant with lower emissions and higher efficiency than most existing coal-fired power plants of comparable size. The net plant heat rate (energy content of the fuel input per useable electrical generation output; i.e., Btu/kilowatt hour) for...
Saved in:
Online Access: |
Online Access |
---|---|
Corporate Authors: | , |
Format: | Government Document Electronic eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Washington, D.C. : Oak Ridge, Tenn. :
United States. Dept. of Energy ; distributed by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Dept. of Energy,
1993.
|
Subjects: |
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | b5951172 | ||
003 | CoU | ||
005 | 20080212000000.0 | ||
006 | m d f | ||
007 | cr un | ||
008 | 100524e19930501dcu st f0|||||eng|d | ||
035 | |a (TOE)ost10179377 | ||
035 | |a (TOE)10179377 | ||
040 | |a TOE |c TOE | ||
049 | |a GDWR | ||
072 | 7 | |a 20 |2 edbsc | |
086 | 0 | |a E 1.99:doe/ea--0853 | |
086 | 0 | |a E 1.99:doe/ea--0853 | |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Wabash River Coal Gasification Combined Cycle Repowering Project |h [electronic resource] : |b Clean Coal Technology Program. Environmental Assessment. |
260 | |a Washington, D.C. : |b United States. Dept. of Energy ; |a Oak Ridge, Tenn. : |b distributed by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Dept. of Energy, |c 1993. | ||
300 | |a 83 p. : |b digital, PDF file. | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent. | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia. | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier. | ||
500 | |a Published through the Information Bridge: DOE Scientific and Technical Information. | ||
500 | |a 05/01/1993. | ||
500 | |a "doe/ea--0853" | ||
500 | |a "DE93019114" | ||
500 | |a "NONE" | ||
513 | |a Topical; |b 05/01/1993. | ||
520 | 3 | |a The proposed project would result in a combined-cycle power plant with lower emissions and higher efficiency than most existing coal-fired power plants of comparable size. The net plant heat rate (energy content of the fuel input per useable electrical generation output; i.e., Btu/kilowatt hour) for the new repowered unit would be a 21% improvement over the existing unit, while reducing SO₂ emissions by greater than 90% and limiting NOₓ emissions by greater than 85% over that produced by conventional coal-fired boilers. The technology, which relies on gasified coal, is capable of producing as much as 25% more electricity from a given amount of coal than todaỳs conventional coal-burning methods. Besides having the positive environmental benefit of producing less pollutants per unit of power generated, the higher overall efficiency of the proposed CGCC project encourages greater utilization to meet base load requirements in order to realize the associated economic benefits. This greater utilization (i.e., increased capacity factor) of a cleaner operating plant has global environmental benefits in that it is likely that such power would replace power currently being produced by less efficient plants emitting a greater volume of pollutants per unit of power generated. | |
650 | 7 | |a Sulfur Dioxide. |2 local. | |
650 | 7 | |a Us Clean Coal Technology Program. |2 local. | |
650 | 7 | |a Thermal Efficiency. |2 local. | |
650 | 7 | |a Nitrogen Oxides. |2 local. | |
650 | 7 | |a Environmental Impacts. |2 local. | |
650 | 7 | |a Coal Gasification. |2 local. | |
650 | 7 | |a Air Pollution Abatement. |2 local. | |
650 | 7 | |a Fossil-fuel Power Plants. |2 local. | |
650 | 7 | |a Demonstration Programs. |2 local. | |
650 | 7 | |a Combined-cycle Power Plants. |2 local. | |
650 | 7 | |a Heat Rate. |2 local. | |
650 | 7 | |a Retrofitting. |2 local. | |
650 | 7 | |a Fossil-fueled Power Plants. |2 edbsc. | |
710 | 1 | |a United States. |b Office of the Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy. |4 res. | |
710 | 1 | |a United States. |b Department of Energy. |4 spn. | |
710 | 1 | |a United States. |b Department of Energy. |b Office of Scientific and Technical Information. |4 res. | |
710 | 1 | |a United States. |b Department of Energy. |b Office of Scientific and Technical Information. |4 dst. | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/10179377-KNwJ1N/ |z Online Access |
907 | |a .b59511722 |b 03-06-23 |c 05-25-10 | ||
998 | |a web |b 05-25-10 |c f |d m |e p |f eng |g dcu |h 0 |i 1 | ||
956 | |a Information bridge | ||
999 | f | f | |i 93f48c3f-0832-579d-bde4-4184b5479159 |s 0d0c21e5-89f3-5f77-8b05-2484fa8c592e |
952 | f | f | |p Can circulate |a University of Colorado Boulder |b Online |c Online |d Online |e E 1.99:doe/ea--0853 |h Superintendent of Documents classification |i web |n 1 |