Fiction and the languages of law : understanding contemporary legal discourse.

Contemporary legal reasoning has more in common with fictional discourse than we tend to realize. Through an examination of the U.S. Supreme Court's written output during a recent landmark term, this book exposes many of the parallels between these two special kinds of language use. Focusing on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via Taylor & Francis)
Main Author: Petroski, Karen
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: London : Routledge, 2018.
Series:Law, language and communication.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000xa 4500
001 b11643980
003 CoU
005 20210115100420.4
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 181103s2018 enk ob 001 0 eng d
020 |a 9781351163828  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 1351163825  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9781351163811 
020 |a 1351163817 
020 |a 9781351163842 
020 |a 1351163841 
020 |a 9781351163835  |q (electronic bk. ;  |q PDF) 
020 |a 1351163833  |q (electronic bk. ;  |q PDF) 
020 |z 1351163833 
020 |z 9780815350118  |q (hbk.) 
024 8 |a 10.4324/9781351163842 
035 |a (OCoLC)tfe1061121803 
035 |a (OCoLC)1061121803 
037 |a tfe9781351163842 
040 |a EBLCP  |b eng  |e pn  |c EBLCP  |d N$T  |d UKMGB  |d TYFRS  |d OCLCF  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ 
043 |a n-us--- 
049 |a GWRE 
050 4 |a KF250 
100 1 |a Petroski, Karen.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2018032399. 
245 1 0 |a Fiction and the languages of law :  |b understanding contemporary legal discourse. 
260 |a London :  |b Routledge,  |c 2018. 
300 |a 1 online resource (241 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
336 |a still image  |b sti  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier. 
490 1 |a Law, language and communication. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
520 |a Contemporary legal reasoning has more in common with fictional discourse than we tend to realize. Through an examination of the U.S. Supreme Court's written output during a recent landmark term, this book exposes many of the parallels between these two special kinds of language use. Focusing on linguistic and rhetorical patterns in the dozens of reasoned opinions issued by the Court between October 2014 and June 2015, the book takes nonlawyer readers on a lively tour of contemporary American legal reasoning and acquaints legal readers with some surprising features of their own thinking and writing habits. It analyzes cases addressing a huge variety of issues, ranging from the rights of drivers stopped by the police to the decision-making processes of the Environmental Protection Agency--as well as the term's best-known case, which recognized a constitutional right to marriage for same-sex as well as different-sex couples. Fiction and the Languages of Law reframes a number of long-running legal debates, identifies other related paradoxes within legal discourse, and traces them all to common sources: judges' and lawyers' habit of alternating unselfconsciously between two different attitudes toward the language they use, and a set of professional biases that tends to prevent scrutiny of that habit. 
545 0 |a Dr Karen Petroski, St Louis University School of Law, USA, has been teaching law since 2008 and is trained in both literary analysis and law. She has published several articles and book chapters on legal fictions and the relationship between fictional and legal discourse, including chapters in Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice (ed. Maksymilian Del Mar & William Twining, Springer, 2015) and The Nature of Legal Interpretation: What Jurists Can Learn About Legal Interpretation from Linguistics and Philosophy (ed. Brian Slocum, Univ. of Chicago Press, 2017) 
588 0 |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed November 6, 2018) 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848  |1 http://isni.org/isni/000000012176610X. 
650 0 |a Law  |z United States  |x Language.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008106838. 
650 0 |a Judicial opinions  |z United States  |x Language. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00529481. 
650 7 |a Judicial opinions  |x Language.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00984690. 
650 7 |a Law  |x Language.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00993769. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155. 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |z 9780815350118. 
830 0 |a Law, language and communication.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2011095703. 
856 4 0 |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351163842  |z Full Text (via Taylor & Francis) 
907 |a .b116439804  |b 05-04-22  |c 01-23-21 
998 |a web  |b 08-10-21  |c b  |d b   |e -  |f eng  |g enk  |h 0  |i 1 
907 |a .b116439804  |b 09-08-21  |c 01-23-21 
907 |a .b116439804  |b 08-10-21  |c 01-23-21 
944 |a MARS - RDA ENRICHED 
915 |a I 
956 |a Taylor & Francis eBooks 
956 |b Taylor & Francis All eBooks 
999 f f |i 5d8ca207-48ae-594e-a484-0911c0f25df1  |s 421d6829-6c13-52ab-b46d-2fb9b7ef4600 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e KF250  |h Library of Congress classification  |i web  |n 1