How to heasure the quality of judicial reasoning / Mátyás Bencze, Gar Yein Ng, editors.

This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that individual judgments should meet, presenting both academic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via Springer)
Other Authors: Bencze, Mátyás, 1973- (Editor), Ng, Gar Yein, 1978- (Editor)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Cham, switzerland : Springer, [2018]
Series:Ius gentium (Dordrecht, Netherlands) ; v. 69.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000xi 4500
001 b11352629
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 180905s2018 sz o 000 0 eng d
005 20240423172233.6
019 |a 1050602152  |a 1064547047  |a 1078908847  |a 1081235105  |a 1084339920  |a 1103278815 
020 |a 9783319973166  |q (electronic book) 
020 |a 3319973169  |q (electronic book) 
020 |a 9783319973173  |q (print) 
020 |a 3319973177 
020 |a 9783030073336  |q (print) 
020 |a 3030073335 
020 |z 9783319973159 
020 |z 3319973150 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6 
035 |a (OCoLC)spr1050448404 
035 |a (OCoLC)1050448404  |z (OCoLC)1050602152  |z (OCoLC)1064547047  |z (OCoLC)1078908847  |z (OCoLC)1081235105  |z (OCoLC)1084339920  |z (OCoLC)1103278815 
037 |a spr978-3-319-97316-6 
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c N$T  |d N$T  |d EBLCP  |d YDX  |d NLE  |d DKU  |d OCLCF  |d UKMGB  |d FIE  |d COO  |d MERER  |d LEAUB  |d GW5XE  |d UKAHL  |d VT2  |d OCLCQ 
049 |a GWRE 
050 4 |a K2146  |b .H69 2018 
245 0 0 |a How to heasure the quality of judicial reasoning /  |c Mátyás Bencze, Gar Yein Ng, editors. 
264 1 |a Cham, switzerland :  |b Springer,  |c [2018] 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier. 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda. 
490 1 |a Ius gentium ;  |v volume 69. 
505 0 |a Intro; Contents; Editors and Contributors; 1 Measuring the Unmeasurable?; Abstract; 1 Measuring the Quality of Judicial Reasoning; 2 Country Studies: A Comparative Experience; 3 Measuring the Quality of Judicial Reasoning in Supranational Courts; 4 Conclusion; References; 2 Judging and the Ethical Life; Abstract; 1 Introduction; 2 The Unjust Judge; 2.1 The Anxious Judge; 2.2 The Judge in the Middle; 2.3 Forgetting the Widow; 2.4 Escape into Rules; 2.5 The Judge Disappears; 2.6 The Widow Disappears; 3 Moral Machines; 3.1 Robojudge; 3.2 The Kantian Saint; 3.3 Hard Cases Make Bad Law. 
505 8 |a 4 Confronting the Widow4.1 Domesticating the Particular; 4.2 The Anxiety of the Particular; 4.3 Listening to the Particular; 5 In the Judgement Space; 5.1 The Particularity Void; 5.2 Masters of Law; 5.3 Attention; 5.4 At Homeness: Insight and the Hunch; 6 Conclusion; 6.1 At the Limits of Language; 6.2 Beyond Text; 6.3 The Judge and the Ethical Life; References; 3 How to Measure? An Essay on the Social Context of Measuring Quality; Abstract; 1 The Nature of Judicial Work; 2 Justice or Right?; 3 Measurement as Control; 4 Quality Control?; 5 The Context of Measuring Judges; References. 
505 8 |a 4 Judicial Reasoning from the Perspective of Behavioural Law and EconomicsAbstract; 1 Introduction; 2 The Quality of Judicial Decision-Making and Its Limits-The Impact of Heuristics and Biases on Adjudication; 3 Adjudication Under the Shadow of Emotions; 4 Conclusion; Acknowledgements; References; 5 Quality of Justice and Lay Participation in the Light of &!blank; Scientific Studies; Abstract; 1 Introduction; 2 The Importance of Lay Participation in the 21st Century; 2.1 Lay Justice as a Means of Self-governance in Democratic Societies. 
505 8 |a 3 Lay Participation in Dispensing Justice as a Means of Strengthening the Legitimacy of Justice4 Lay Persons as Fact-Finders; 5 Control Function; 6 Conclusions; Acknowledgements; References; 6 Obstacles and Opportunities-Measuring the Quality of Judicial Reasoning; Abstract; 1 Introduction; 2 Why Reasoning?; 3 Standards of the Evaluation; 4 Who Measures?; 5 How to Measure?; 5.1 The Direct Form of Evaluation; 5.2 Indirect Quality Assessment; 6 Conclusion; References; 7 Quality of Judicial Reasoning: England and Wales; Abstract; 1 Introduction; 2 Role of the Judge in England and Wales. 
505 8 |a 3 Standards of Judicial Reasoning: 'The Pull of Justification'3.1 Why Give Reasons?; 3.2 How to Give Reasons?; 4 Skills and Knowledge: Judges as Professionals and Measuring the Standards; 4.1 Merit-Based Appointments and Judicial Skill; 4.2 Quality of Judicial Reasoning at the Supreme Court; 4.3 Quality Standards and Judicial Reasoning: Administrative Tribunals; 5 Other Factors Affecting the Quality of Judicial Reasons; 6 Conclusions; Acknowledgements; References; 8 Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in Italy; Abstract; 1 The Question of the Quality of Justice in Italy. 
520 |a This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that individual judgments should meet, presenting both academic and practical perspectives. Readers are invited to consider such questions as: What is expected from judicial reasoning? Is there a general concept of good quality with regard to judicial reasoning? Are there any attempts being made to measure the quality of judicial reasoning? The focus here is on judges meeting the highest standards possible in adjudication and how they may be held to account for the way they reason. The contributions examine theoretical questions surrounding the measurement of the quality of judicial reasoning, practices and legal systems across Europe, and judicial reasoning in various international courts. Six legal systems in Europe are featured: England and Wales, Finland, Italy, the Czech Republic, France and Hungary as well as three non-domestic levels of court jurisdictions, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The depth and breadth of subject matter presented in this volume ensure its relevance for many years to come. All those with an interest in benchmarking the quality of judicial reasoning, including judges themselves, academics, students and legal practitioners, can find something of value in this book. 
588 0 |a Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on September 14, 2018) 
650 0 |a Judicial process.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85070959. 
650 0 |a Justice, Administration of.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85071120. 
650 7 |a Judicial process.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00984705. 
650 7 |a Justice, Administration of.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00985154. 
700 1 |a Bencze, Mátyás,  |d 1973-  |e editor.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nb2018006696. 
700 1 |a Ng, Gar Yein,  |d 1978-  |e editor.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nb2007012708  |1 http://isni.org/isni/0000000114888037. 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |t How to heasure the quality of judicial reasoning.  |d Cham, switzerland : Springer, [2018]  |z 3319973150  |z 9783319973159  |w (OCoLC)1042352760. 
830 0 |a Ius gentium (Dordrecht, Netherlands) ;  |v v. 69.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2008026674. 
856 4 0 |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6  |z Full Text (via Springer) 
907 |a .b113526295  |b 09-21-20  |c 07-13-20 
998 |a web  |b 07-31-20  |c b  |d b   |e -  |f eng  |g sz   |h 0  |i 1 
907 |a .b113526295  |b 08-03-20  |c 07-13-20 
944 |a MARS - RDA ENRICHED 
915 |a I 
956 |a Springer e-books 
956 |b Springer Nature - Springer Law and Criminology eBooks 2018 English International 
999 f f |i c83eee21-a5ea-5091-8022-f307ab087738  |s 3c14ca08-c8f3-5db2-a352-d7e93fae3d8a 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e K2146 .H69 2018  |h Library of Congress classification  |i Ebooks, Prospector  |n 1